If he had not injected him self into the situation he would have had no need for self defense. He actively left his house to go look for trouble. He probably planned to kill people that night.
Republicans have demonstrated no reasoning is needed to revoke rights. We will find a Repub. level excuse
Comments
Kyle "The Murderer" Rittenhouse.
We are coming for your guns. YOURS specifically.
Kyle was not acting as a vigilante, as he did not enforce any law.
And he merely exercised his right to self-defense against violent rioters that unjustifiably attacked him.
How, exactly, are you going to come for our guns? 🤣
Republicans have demonstrated no reasoning is needed to revoke rights. We will find a Repub. level excuse
Where is your evidence that he was looking for trouble?
Provide it.
Oh wait, that evidence does not exist, you simply oppose the right to self-defense. 😉
Why are you refusing to?
In fact, there's an entire state statute that covers this.
You should read it.
Rittenhouse claimed self defense.
How didn't the self defense statute apply to the circumstances that Rittenhouse faced?
He should never left his house to look for trouble to get into. Killer.
And you still have provided zero evidence that he was looking for trouble.
How interesting.