I can't help but feel that this wagon-circling and fact-massaging reflects a pattern of behaviour by the leadership of Science - of treating the science world as a kind of guild whose interests must be advanced, of explicitly leveraging the institution to promote certain political views as truth.
Comments
con'ted
Is human-caused climate change occurring? Here is the (strong) evidence that it is.
Does this imply specific policies?
con'ted
con'ted
con'ted
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aav7494
I do think that the sloppiness and bullheadedness around the article was in part because it (apparently) comported so well with concerns around equity and diversity.