I did not at any time mean to impugn your journalism. I was focused only on the comments of the scientists. Those of Barry Rosen were a great disappointment to many. The caveats expressed were contradictory to many other statements, so it is hard to accept them as authentic.
Comments
I don't know why other journalists chose not to include those caveats -- and ask more questions to clarify them.
But again, it seems we're still having today the same got-to-get-your-attention-no-matter-what problems. It's also a journalism problem.