Profile avatar
adeel-ahmed.bsky.social
Microphysiological systems, cell-substrate interactions. Postdoc at the Beebe Lab, UW Madison. Constantly thinking about the future of science! Photography and microscopy enthusiast 📸
15 posts 990 followers 556 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter

It seems easy to make fun of basic science – for example why would you want to study bacterial immune systems? But then you would have to admit that that’s exactly what led to the discovery of using CRISPR as an insanely good technology for genome engineering.

Did you know? Black Friday is named in honor of Rebecca Black, who invented Friday in 2011.

1/23 Big news for the #ObenaufLab! So excited to finally share our new study providing another puzzle piece, why immunotherapy fails in many tumors, now out in @Nature 🧵👇 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

The goal is not to have a zero risk project; those are generally not worth working on. People with a good relationship with risk are definitely not avoiding it. They are super honest about it and they basically make it their goal to slowly chip away at it. nightscience.buzzsprout.com/1744020/epis...

The strain on scientific publishing: we set out to characterise the remarkable growth of the scientific literature in the last few years, in spite of declining growth in total scientists. What is going on? direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... A 🧵 1/n #AcademicSky #PhDchat #ScientificPublishing #SciPub

My one constructive criticism on BlueSky, as a community: we need to “like” less and “retweet” more. In the absence of an algorithm, that’s the way we find each other and reward good content.

Please allow me to re-share my rough sketch of some advanced carbon capture technology

🎨 In case anyone need… The NIH BioArt Source is an awesome library of *free* professionally drawn illustrations for scientific presentations or figures. Downloadable in HD. Thank you NIH for this invaluable tool 🙏! Check it out 👇 bioart.niaid.nih.gov

Post a picture you took (no description) to bring some zen to the skyline

We need to have a ‘code of conduct’ for reviewing manuscripts, like (1) if you say that something is not novel then provide the reference. (2) If you propose an experiment, state precisely to which claim it is crucial. (3) If you want to say something nasty then sign your name.

Too often we spend only two weeks choosing a problem and then many years trying solving it, but this limits our potential impact. A must read for PhD students: Problem choice and decision trees in science and engineering. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38608651/

Hi everyone, I am a postdoc at UW-Madison developing microphysiological systems for predicting patient response to cancer therapies.

wtf this is crazy www.nature.com/articles/s41...

On the side, please enjoy these stunning view of the northern lights from Wisconsin!

I had forgotten what it was like to go on social media and not instantly get pissed off, this is refreshing!