Profile avatar
alexqgb.bsky.social
⚔️
6,712 posts 1,263 followers 581 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

A nice thing about the Financial Times is that they don’t feel compelled to publish shitty opinions by complete fucking idiots simply because the complete fucking idiot happens to be a conservative.

us government went from telling miners “learn to code” to telling coders “learn to mine” in less than ten years

It is very good question and one I’ve been asking for months. If there is an international agreement with El Salvador for these renditions, the Trump administration is legally required under the Case-Zablocki Act to share it with Congress. To my knowledge, they have not done so.

One of the most amazing things about the tariff rollout was that they used (at least) three mutually exclusive arguments to justify them and everything they've done since the initial rollout has proven a different one of them false

The thumbs down stings so much more than the bird.

The principle at stake here is so fundamental it predates even Magna Carta in English law, and before that stretching all the way back to Rome, and has its similarly ancient equivalents in every legal system in the world, because it's the inherent bedrock foundation of what courts and laws are for.

This is a concession by the U.S. government that its “arrangement” with El Salvador is irrevocable. To me this has to be grounds to argue that the arrangement itself is unconstitutional under the Fifth and Eighth Amendments

100%. It really is time to go there. Again.

Sounds like centralized economic planning - a notorious sinkhole of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Really hoping we’ve defenestrated this administration before California gets hit by the Big One (e.g., the overdue M7+ on the Hayward fault)

Do face computers get tariffed?

The problem with forcing countries to create a new world without you is that once they've done so, they aren't going back

In a rare bit of good news for everyone, the number of new podcasts being created is going down. on.ft.com/4ihZp86 Presumably because everyone already has one

In shaking down all these firms for 'pro bono' work, has Trump just misappropriated $1b for a private legal army outside of Congressional oversight?

who knew the bubble about to burst was America

So, here's one interesting angle: How can this be an important foreign diplomatic matter if the president doesn't know shit about it?

What the fuck this is rediscovering what we did when we designed castles

laugh / cry / laugh / cry

I see we've reached the "don't worry, the Finance Minister is a Western-educated former fund manager" stage of the emerging market crisis playbook. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

gee i wonder why voters might've been confused about the existential stakes of the last election

I think we're getting close to a all at once phase I have also decided that there can be a series of all at once phases, you can have more than one

Welp they're doing the Roosevelt Reservation crazy strategy, giving the military "jurisdiction" over a 60-foot-wide stretch of land from CA to AZ, authorizing troops to detain migrants for "trespassing on military property," thus trying to bypass the Posse Commitatus Act. It's bad and dumb, folks.

The brother is $40mm shy of shaking Big Law down for a cool $1 billion.

So they’re spending money that’s not budgeted and cutting spending that is budgeted. They’re post-budget.