Profile avatar
attacus.net
Computational entomologist, privacy enthusiast, historian. Perpetually raging against the ghost in the machine. Mastodon: @[email protected] 👁 Digital Rights Watch | 🎙 Byte Into IT on đŸ“» 3RRR FM | 🐍 PyCon AU
38 posts 418 followers 334 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
It still made mistakes (kept “forgetting” it was a monophonic synth, for example), but I only trusted it to reword the manual and define new-to-me terms, not teach me synthesis. I don’t need it for that any more. It had a place and a time and a very focused purpose. And now I pay a human teacher.
comment in response to post
Over the Xmas break I was gifted a synthesiser (it’s rad). The manual with the instrument was factual but not instructive. Giving the manual to a model and asking it for a pathway through helped a lot with getting started and figuring out what to look up and read or watch to learn more.
comment in response to post
I have used some of these tools to prototype an idea or debug a problem when working solo, but I would not publish code that I could not talk through, line by line.
comment in response to post
If you’re thinking (or overthinking, hear hear!) you’re doing it right. This stuff leads to either dreck or danger when the operator doesn’t think at all. Of your objections, the only one I would push back on is “laziness”. If you’re learning something new & asking questions, you’re using your brain
comment in response to post
What’s the “wrong” feeling for you? Too easy to get something working? Too much like you aren’t sure what to do next or how to keep going in a responsible fashion? Too much like you’re disrespecting a different profession or skillset by using AI to do that work? Another thing?
comment in response to post
A thousand percent this. They’ll make a mint this coming week with all the new year resolution purchasing.
comment in response to post
Replace “genetic knowledge” with “AI” and I’m pretty sure I saw a post with that opinion just last week
comment in response to post
Oh hey, @hacks4pancakes.com! We were also introduced over on Mastodon. I would be happy to chat!
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Maybe the range of trust between most and least trusted is from .5/100 to 1.3/100, or something
comment in response to post
If it won’t clutter your list with people who didn’t/couldn’t actually attend, then sure! Thank you!
comment in response to post
I can see that some others have already asked about recordings, and you’ve answered that. As I’m in Melbourne, Australia, and this is happening throughout my night, is there any other way I can catch up on the proceedings afterwards? E.g. publications or otherwise?
comment in response to post
I certainly wouldn’t have thought the dictionary themselves would have made a mistake about the etymology!
comment in response to post
Done!
comment in response to post
It is! Added!
comment in response to post
Hello! Please add me. I do information security, Python things, digital rights advocacy, and I interview people and speak about technology on the radio.
comment in response to post
Done!
comment in response to post
You’re in!
comment in response to post
Definitely add me!
comment in response to post
“Some members of [the data] community have been so overwhelmed by the success of a certain technology for processing data that they have confused this technology with the natural semantics of information. They have forgotten any other way to think [
] — the mentality of the punched card.” Dang.
comment in response to post
👋 Hello, yes please!
comment in response to post
In the first chapter I learned that the California DMV once solved the Ship of Theseus problem for themselves. They once declared that a car is the same car as long as the engine block remains the same, regardless of literally any other modifications.
comment in response to post
I’m about a quarter of the way through, and mostly thinking that the book could be subtitled “Falsehoods Programmers Believe about the Universe”.
comment in response to post
Oh, this is going to be interesting. It already has me thinking about many things and I’m not yet through the original preface.
comment in response to post
I’m in!
comment in response to post
Oof. I’m glad you figured it out and also annoyed at the dark pattern.