Profile avatar
bruxconf2025.bsky.social
The Perfect Storm Conference, Brussels, Thursday 30th January
151 posts 44 followers 3 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

A room full of applause for Lina Khan to close out the day @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social @capitolforum.bsky.social

(1/2) The FTC sought to ensure it was using all the tools it’s been given during her tenure, says Lina Khan. “Over the decades a whole swath of them had just become dormant.” The agency also ensured it was “listening to regular people—that’s in part just good government,” she says.

Happening now: Lina Khan's remarks, moderated by @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social and @capitolforum.bsky.social's Teddy Downey

(1/2) Citing the FTC's success in blocking Kroger/Albertsons, Lina Khan says if you asked her four years ago whether she thought the agency would be able to achieve what it did in such a short time, her answer would probably have been no.

@capitolforum.bsky.social executive editor and CEO Teddy Downey sits down for an interview with Lina Khan to wrap up the day @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

“Regulation should be done to empower,” says BrighterAI cofounder and CEO Marian Gläser. The EU needs to move fast, the world is moving on and “we shouldn't press the snooze button again.”

Trump doesn’t need a tariff threat to try to take over Greenland, says @protonprivacy.bsky.social CEO Andy Yen. The US president could simply get what he wants by saying he’ll order Microsoft, Google, Amazon and the like to stop operating there. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

📸 Snapshots from our last panel, “Algorithmic Amplification, Platform Power, Freedom of Speech and Tech Oligarchs” @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

The problem or sovereignty is not a problem of tomorrow, it’s a problem of today and we have to address it. Great remark by Andy Yen @proton.me Ceo @bruxconf2025.bsky.social

The reason for Nvidia’s dominance in hardware, says German AI startup founder Jonas Andrulis, is “because nobody has a choice... These systems are so mature and so powerful that it's not easy to have a choice,” he said. “We can dislike that,” he added, “but it doesn’t change the reality.”

"Sovereignty can only come from strength and strength can only come from value," says Aleph Alpha founder Jonas Andrulis. "We have to build." @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

“This is a do or die moment, I would say, ”says Axel Voss, Member of the European Parliament “We can’t take our time and have wonderful discussions any longer” on digital sovereignty and industrial policy. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

(1/2) Big Tech firms likely won’t rush to certify their platforms but rewarding smaller platforms who do so could be very useful, Lavie posits.

(1/2) Bocconi University Prof Dovev Lavie ends the panel by proposing voluntary certification for platforms. “It can motivate a new generation of emerging platforms that have business models that are more stakeholder-oriented,” he says.

(1/2) Rolnik throws out his agenda to applause: Remove Section 230 protections for platforms that engage in surveillance. Consider banning platforms that push a political agenda. No fake accounts – bots should’t have free speech rights.

“Algorothmic amplification is the water that we are all swimming in now. And like fish, we rarely stop to question these waters. But we should,” warns University of Chicago Professor Guy Rolnik

“Disinformation is a wake up call for platforms and the tech sector,” @chionwurah.bsky.social adds. “It could be used to say there should be less competition because China is coming for our tech lunch. But we need competition in our own tech sector to counteract China.” @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

@chionwurah.bsky.social: “Freedom of speech is incredibly important and there are some tensions there. But the business model of the platforms means there is an incentive: there is a reward for lying and there is no reward for telling the truth...

“It’s great to hear that we’re not alone and that we’re still a part of Europe, even if we’re not part of the EU,” says UK MP @chionwurah.bsky.social, head of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, on the day’s discussion. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Nikolay points to the anti-hate speech code that major platforms agreed to last week. These systems have proved very fruitful when it comes to protecting things like elections, she says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

DG Connect Deputy Director General Renate Nikolay notes there’s no requirement in the DSA for platforms to take down content, responding to earlier comments from Jacob Mchangama. That’s for EU member states to decide, she says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Debate erupts between @alexandrageese.bsky.social and Jacob Mchangama. Free speech has historically been weaponized against minorities, Jacob Mchangama says in response to @alexandrageese.bsky.social's claims that some restriction is needed to protect the same groups. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

📸 A look at our last panel, “How Will Trump 2.0 Wield Antitrust Policy, and Deliver on Economic Populism?” @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Media pluralism and banning Holocaust denial was an American-imposed condition on Germany becoming a free country after WW2, notes @alexandrageese.bsky.social @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

@marietjeschaake.bsky.social says this debate is all about power and who has the ability to govern our lives, because technology is interwoven with every aspect. It’s broader than just speech, she says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

It’s only because we spent the last five years building a tech stack that we’re able to bid for TikTok and provide the scale, McCourt says about Project Liberty ’s offer to buy the platform. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

(1/2) “These platforms are highly manipulative and we see now the harms,” McCourt, Project Liberty Chair, says. It’s time to adopt new open-source, owned-by-all technology models, he adds. “We want to be citizens in the digital age, not reverted to subjects in the digital age.”

(1/2) Project Liberty Chair Frank McCourt: “The policymaking apparatus in the US is no match for the speed, the power, the money of Big Tech.”

Platforms should instead make users more able to decide what type of content they say so we get around corporate centralization but also overregulation from governments that impinges on free speech, Jacob Mchangama posits. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Jacob Mchangama says 90% to 98% of deleted comments are “perfectly lawful” yet the DMA/DSA incentivises platforms to remove this content. “In Europe, free speech is seen as a threat to democracy,” he says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Jacob Mchangama, Founder and Exec Director of The Future of Free Speech, says there are good reasons to be wary of Big Tech, but the European approach is worse than the disease in many ways. “It’s likely to contribute to rollbacks of important historical gains.” @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

“One national champion in the U.S. is a huge problem from a resilience and reliance perspective,” says Rebecca Slaughter, U.S. Federal Trade Commissioner. The U.S. can beat China by having multiple strong players in each sector, she says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

(1/2) Roger Alford says EU/U.S. alignment will be issue-dependent. “I think Europe and the US will be aligned about the threat of China to become the predominant economy in the world, and if there can be alignment on that then it’s quite positive,” he says.

China is a common problem for the U.S and Europe, Lynn says. “We should be talking about not how are we going to disrupt each other’s democracies, but what are we going to do about China to have a peaceful and more cooperative world at the end of the day.” @openmarkets.bsky.social

Barry Lynn says he’s “very encouraged” by conversations in Brussels about Big Tech enforcement and standing up for democracy. “There are people across [the U.S.], Democrats and Republicans… We stand with you.” @openmarkets.bsky.social @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

“Musk intends to overthrow your democracy. He’s using his power to overthrow your democracy,” Barry Lynn tells the Brussels audience. @openmarkets.bsky.social @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Whether Republican or Democrat, “nobody is free in a situation in which the platform has the freedom to shape your thoughts,” Barry Lynn adds. @openmarkets.bsky.social @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social

Barry Lynn of @openmarkets.bsky.social notes that despite political differences, he worked across the aisle with TX AG Paxton on the Google AdTech case. “Everybody is threatened by the same corporation, by the same concentration of power,” he says. @cristinacaffarra.bsky.social