Profile avatar
chrisgiles.ft.com
Economics Commentator, Financial Times; Honorary Professor of Practice, UCL Policy Lab Sign up to my central banks newsletter here https://ep.ft.com/newsletters/subscribe?newsletterIds=6501cc9ec6e3c91c18b0b9e6
416 posts 23,889 followers 334 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

“EVERYONE IS WRONG ABOUT RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND HOW I HANDLE IT but also maybe Putin is not the guy I thought.”

No criticism of the chancellor implied here, but UK's trade with the EU is DEFINITIVELY more important than that with the US, not "arguably" That is just a fact www.ft.com/content/7a5a...

China playing hardball and wating for the Trump capitulation (which will come) was utterly predictable and predicted China tells US to ‘cancel all unilateral tariffs’ if it wants talks ft.com/content/3e07... via @ft

The US statement to the IMFC is (governing body of the IMF) is.... ....remarkably sane Could have been written by many administrations in recent decades home.treasury.gov/news/press-r...

Following today’s horrible public finance numbers, …either @OBR_UK forecasts are hopeless … or @ONS initial figures are terrible Which UK economic institution will be shown to have come up short? GAME ON

Latest from the FT's Monetary Policy Radar - our new Fed scenarios on.ft.com/4jnOU4u

Trump requirements for next Fed chair - Ignore tariffs are stagflationary - Like lower interest rates - Kiss ass Is this now the world's worst job? on.ft.com/4cN4AM6

"the inflationary effects of Trump’s tariffs hit mostly in the US. Other countries facing a demand shock can simply offset this with looser policy". - on.ft.com/3S4shFW via @chrisgiles.ft.com

It’s time to retire the phrase, “when America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold” on.ft.com/3RoUozD The US, not others, will feel most pain from its economic mistakes

The US, not others, will feel most pain from its economic mistakes

Cool

How rich are you? www.ft.com/content/3890...

A nice write up of our research as part of @escoeorg.bsky.social on local consumption spending. More info (and interactive graphics!) here! ifs.org.uk/articles/whi...

Standing in for the Inside Politics newsletter today, I had some fin with the question of who is "well-off"? But mostly I had a go at the notion that people in London are really rich and that regulators should do redistribution on.ft.com/4jdbTyW

Quality comments on the @katie0martin.ft.com excellent piece today

It really matters if you make behavioural assumptions when looking at Trump's tariffs and the effective overall rate. This is a massive cost shock to the US - what to do - my newsletter with help from @isabellamweber.bsky.social www.ft.com/content/b11b...

Nah, we’re good thanks

Democrats are in deep gloom about the US economy. Even republicans are beginning to look down (University of Michigan survey)

The test case is going to the Supreme Court and faster than we expected

this is getting a little lost but 😱

A reminder to all those who like to measure the global economy in market exchange rates The size of the US economy has fallen 9 per cent since Donald Trump's inauguration in Euro terms

European stocks up (a bit) today after a grim US session yday. Dollar getting smacked. Feels like the market is isolating the patient.

This is a fantastic article by @adamposen.bsky.social explaining with great clarity why the conventional wisdom that the US has the upper hand in a bilateral trade war with China is dead wrong. www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...

Oh - the 125% China tariff is actually 145% All the previous ones did not include existing tariffs and 84% (ie 104%) has been upped to 125% in new Executive order

It's almost impossible to calculate the effective US tariff rate now... On 2024 trading patterns, the 125% China tariff raises the US effective rate 14 percentage points alone... ... that won't happen

Good news for buyers of uncertainty.... big tariffs lasted a day

Will the Fed intervene in disorderly markets (especially Treasuries)? Under what authority? Not if it can possibly help it.... on.ft.com/42p2Nbo

"The watchdog is so skint, I am told, that it cannot afford one subscription to any news organisation," writes @chrisgiles.ft.com on the OBR. A consistent problem in Britain is trying to do politics/policy on the cheap (see also: Spads). www.ft.com/content/2433...

Pleased to see @chrisgiles.ft.com make this point I keep banging away at. The fiscal framework incentivises bad policy making. It's doing the opposite of what it was supposed to do.

In which @chrisgiles.ft.com says the OBR has ended up setting policy second hand with questions over democratic legitimacy - so "hand the guesswork over productivity growth back to ministers" www.ft.com/content/2433...

Ahead of tariff day, the US economy whiffs of stagflation. It is faint still and mostly in soft data, but difficult to disguise My newsletter www.ft.com/content/341a...

“It's uncomfortable for the government, it's uncomfortable for the OBR itself. And I think in a democratic process, it feels pretty uncomfortable more widely still.” @chrisgiles.ft.com UCL Policy Lab Hon Prof on the challanges for the OBR and economic projections. podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/p...

Not good for Fed independence

I am a stuck record on this. OBR’s halving of the 2025 growth “forecast” is almost entirely in the past. It’s not a forecast at all, just a reflection of what has happened

Is the world addicted to debt? Investors have been warning that governments are addicted to debt for the past 20 years and the alarm bells are growing louder. This FT film examines what some people are calling the biggest issue in finance today youtu.be/n1jhoU9Mp_U?...