Profile avatar
daviddagan.bsky.social
Director of editorial and academic affairs at Niskanen Center. Read Hypertext: hypertext.niskanencenter.org. Read The Liberal Fortress: daviddagan.substack.com. Book: http://amzn.to/29rrt90.
135 posts 796 followers 256 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

Critically important work. This is the infrastructure for fighting fear and fostering collective action.

Let me sound an optimistic note. Depending how this blows up - and it will blow up - there is a *chance* that we get a belated public appreciation for government, a repudiation of this crazy dismantling, and a surge of smart people motivated to rebuild and confident the madness will not be repeated.

This aged well: "The global elite of Brussels and Davos that so many voters detest has certainly led us astray too often. But the alternative that authoritarian populists like Trump are offering is not popular sovereignty. It’s deference to the elites of Moscow and Beijing."

Wouldn't it be great if the business community had billions of dollars, an army of lawyers and lobbyists, and enormous economic leverage to muster in a full-throated, collective defense of American democracy?

I had a genius idea today. I took the engine out of my car. No more wasting money on gas and oil changes!

This is exactly right. It's time for leaders to get noticed, not to hope they overlook you.

It seems to me the likeliest mechanism here is a catastrophe clearly attributable to this dismantling of government that crystallizes the attention of investors and businesses on the many risks we now face. Could be next month, could be next year.

Lotta flak for this guy but the whole thing surfaces an important point: We are seeing FDR's first 100 days in reverse. Then: A massive program enabling government to reconstruct a devastated economy. Now: a massive program dismantling government that will shrivel an otherwise-promising economy.

*This* from @dandrezner.bsky.social: If you are serious about stopping Trump, the best thing you can do is to welcome these people with open arms. They are your most credible messengers. Don't call them slow on the uptake. Don't mock. They're doing a hard thing - admitting error in public.

Wild to think how strong a position the US would be in geopolitically if it weren’t just shooting itself in both feet. Russia’s military and economy devastated. China stagnating, in massive debt, and falling off a demographic cliff. Europe…adrift at best. An own goal of unbelievable proportions.

Much debate about what to name our constitutional disintegration. I'm not on board with crisis/coup, but I think it's critical to name the components of authoritarianism coming together: *Corruption *Coercion *Anti-constitutionalism *Sabotage *Incitement. daviddagan.substack.com/p/elements-o...

Civil servants should take a page from colleagues at DOJ and refuse such orders. Easier said than done. But an infrastructure is quickly coming together to support them.

Let’s see what motivates this guy to join DOG…oh

If there are genuine worries then we should also consider that if there is an opening it is in the early days and not under a consolidated authoritarian regime. Making a big noise now has greater chances of success

This will become more and more true as it grows obvious to people that this administration is steering us into a generational disaster. The premium on a reputation for integrity will rise fast.

They might be able to defy courts. But they can't break the lawyers (or agents) they need to run DOJ as a protection racket. This is going to prove a hard limit on this administration's authoritarian ambitions. Turns out when people study and then practice the law, most end up believing in it.

This woman is going to inspire a generation of constitutional conservatives. All of these people deserve our gratitude and any help they need to ride out the storm they are going to face.

This woman is a hero and proof that for many in the conservative legal movement, it's still about LAW. Ordered to turn DOJ into a protection racket, she told her new bosses to pound sand. May many other DOJ employees of all political persuasions follow her lead, knowing we have their backs.

It understates the danger to say politicization of the state brings us back to the 19th C spoils system. That was a completely different state. Much of its work was truly clerical. And it was nowhere near as able to coerce. No IRS, no FBI, no standing Army, no sweeping regs.

But most of those judges were still trained to believe in the law. The McConnells who acceded to Trump for judicial noms thought they could control his radicalism. They were wrong.

It's also not cost cutting. First, the money legally still has to be spent. Second, rebuilding from these disasters is going to cost a hell of a lot more than avoiding them would have.

A lot of people are having a hard time understanding, so let me explain it to you: When Elon Musk doxes normal people doing their jobs, it's a heroic exposure of the deep state and they deserve to have their lives ruined. When reporters point out that he is hiring racists, it's a witch hunt. Get it?

Today: Marc Dunkelman replies to @dsquareddigest.bsky.social with an argument that previews his terrific upcoming book. hypertext.niskanencenter.org/p/our-proble... Read Davies, Dunkelman, and @pahlkadot.bsky.social, and you will be prepared for the Very Big Fix that will be required after all this.

Yesterday I wrote rather bleakly about our present condition and the fact that it will take time before the worms turns, and we will suffer a great deal of damage until then. Today, @pahlkadot.bsky.social reminds us there is an affirmative program to offer as an alternative to DOGE's abuses.

Russell Vought has been confirmed. His words: Originalism should mean "to understand the logic of the original Constitution and how these authorities should be used unencumbered by the scar tissue resulting from decades of bad cases and bad statesmen." That is, unencumbered by the law.

There are heroes in the civil service sticking around, working with the people who disdain them, to limit the damage they cause.

Was at an event in DC this evening with a lot of federal employees and it is absolutely wrenching to talk to people who dedicated themselves to public service work through the appalling attacks and uncertainty that they are facing now.

New: Grappling with the full extent of Trump's lawlessness, and considering the levers we have to work with now. Some key points follow in thread: www.niskanencenter.org/the-politics...

This aged fast, but well.

I see we have moved from "YMCA" to the hokey-pokey

I didn't believe Trump would go whole-hog on tariffs b/c markets didn't believe it. But he is on a honeymoon with himself, believing he can muscle over law, markets, and public op. Today, the markets start teaching different. In time, he'll find the mountain he is standing on is actually an anthill.

There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

This is how you motivate people and recruit the best and the brightest, folks - let those hapless civil servants know that ANY job in the private sector is more productive than ANY job in the public sector. www.opm.gov/fork/faq

In Washington, DC real estate: we could simultaneously see a run on oligarch-priced homes along with a slightly delayed glut in homes affordable at the upper end of the locally adjusted GS salary table. www.wsj.com/real-estate/...

This is wrong. Trump won't back police who back him. He will back police who back him AND don't accidentally get in his way. Police are as dispensable to him as any other supporter. You think the Capitol cops were thinking "this is against Trump" when they fought off the mob?