Profile avatar
flglmn.bsky.social
972 posts 2,256 followers 621 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
Posts 24 Comments 26

submitted 257 days ago • 17 comments

never got round to this one before. good stuff

submitted 260 days ago • 1 comment

this has always been the meat of the Alito stories. not just that there’s a “scandal” in the traditional sense, but that he is legitimately a moron

submitted 261 days ago • 16 comments

lmao Google's AI is eating itself already -- telling you how much glue to put on pizza, citing a @katienotopoulos.bsky.social Business Insider article about Google's AI telling people to put glue on pizza

submitted 261 days ago • 24 comments

sound like wrong 'uns to me. a bad lot i shouldn't wonder

submitted 261 days ago • 2 comments

hmm. rather not

submitted 262 days ago • 1 comment

guess they promised not to put his wife in jail after all

submitted 264 days ago • 0 comments

I like the out of nowhere swipe at wyndham lewis in this NYT review of The Unnameable by stephen spender

submitted 264 days ago • 1 comment

seems like the obvious answer here then is that they should all, at all times, say "i am not capable of judging my own accuracy" www.newscientist.com/article/2429...

submitted 268 days ago • 2 comments

what annoys me most about them is that 75% of the ones I get are obvious lies. not that I read them but I involuntarily skim the subject lines and most of them are "your membership in something you never joined or even heard of is about to lapse unless you act NOW" or the like

submitted 268 days ago • 2 comments

my basic mental model of the court divides them into the three liberals; then you've got alito and thomas who i would absolutely believe will vote for any proposed piece of right wing hackery at all, no limitations, no doubt, even and especially the things that sound like or are meant as jokes

submitted 270 days ago • 3 comments

and the technology is still young, imagine the day when you can be in six meetings at once, or ten

submitted 270 days ago • 8 comments

"unfiltered" is a great euphemism

submitted 270 days ago • 4 comments

the punitive damages are meant to do this. that's what they're for. what happened here is that a jury of his peers decided it was right to impose an additional penalty that would make him cry, and a judge calculated the sum necessary to do that

submitted 270 days ago • 1 comment

I think about this all the time. Let’s give a big thank you to “the disgraceful state of analytic art criticism!”

submitted 271 days ago • 4 comments

submitted 271 days ago • 4 comments

as a little treat

submitted 271 days ago • 0 comments

Quicksand gags aren't funny. i actually know a guy sinking in quicksand

submitted 271 days ago • 13 comments

the funny errors were the only good thing about it

submitted 271 days ago • 1 comment

submitted 271 days ago • 1 comment

Israel rejects the Israeli proposal after intense negotiations with Israel

submitted 271 days ago • 32 comments

doing the clockwork orange forced viewing behavior modification scene to every single democratic staffer and consultant and the screen just keeps flashing “appearing savvy to political reporters is not an important goal and does not help you win elections”

submitted 271 days ago • 2 comments

a physician who says the law does not allow abortion under those circumstances may well be wrong in their legal assessment, but a physician who says there is an unacceptable risk that a prosecutor and jury would not agree with their judgment that those circumstances exist is almost certainly right

submitted 271 days ago • 4 comments

people keep saying this "all 34 counts" thing but was it ever really logically possible to convict him on some but not all of the counts. aren't they all the same misrepresentation on different documents

submitted 271 days ago • 5 comments