floriannaudet.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

Ian Fleming's original James Bond novels haven't aged well. For example, Moonraker - published almost exactly 70 years ago in April 1955 - features a villain who's a super-rich industrialist and rocket-maker seeking to cause chaos because he's a secret Nazi. Such a silly idea!

submitted 1 day ago • 75 comments

submitted 1 day ago • 6 comments

Hey @ugentopenscience.bsky.social you have been added to the meta-research and open science starting pack 2.

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

Excellent statement from @plosbiology.org here. Leadership is staggering lacking in the OS space so this is particularly good to see. I hope others will follow.

submitted 2 days ago • 0 comments

Nominations are open for this year's Maddox Prize! Awarded by @Nature.com and @senseaboutsci.bsky.social for those who stood up for science, especially if they faced push-back and harassment. More information here: www.nature.com/immersive/ma...

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

So. It has officially happened. I have been officially let go from my position at CDC. I wasn’t a probationary employee. I had stellar performance reviews every year. I’ll be ok. But please understand that many worked HARD to get into these positions and were doing great public health work.

submitted 2 days ago • 1871 comments

‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

April meeting on academic fraud: www.sjcfairsmeeting.com (turn off VPN if it won't load). With: @steamtraen.eu @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @lewan.bsky.social @retractionwatch.com @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] & more!

submitted 4 days ago • 2 comments

🔬 MedSky 🔬 “The Trump administration’s planned cuts to the National Institutes of Health ( #NIH ) not only threaten essential biomedical research in the US, but the livelihoods of researchers – and some are seriously considering leaving the country.” #US #BiomedicalResearch

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

DOGE recommended firing workers at: -FDA, which oversees Neuralink -FAA, which oversees SpaceX -USAID, which probed Starlink -CFPB, which oversees Tesla's financing arm and a potential payment platform on X. "Conflict of interest" is a severe understatement.

submitted 4 days ago • 1218 comments

We are here : "We will consider anonymity when a clinical scenario is particularly important to share and learn from, or to protect an author’s safety—for example, if they are a whistleblower." Responding to fear and magical thinking in the US, a nice editorial in the @bmj.com.

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

Some news of SHARE-CTD. Good news.

submitted 4 days ago • 1 comment

In 2025, we continue to advocate for policy based on scientific evidence. This 2020 Editorial, “We need leaders that believe in scientific evidence”, resonates today as loudly as ever: plos.io/34lyl59. PLOS Biology also continues to push for DEI and a diverse scientific community: plos.io/3rzxczU 🧪

submitted 4 days ago • 2 comments

This, 💯! I'm very proud to work for a journal and organisation that stand by these principles.

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

On psychedelics: 'there is so much enthusiasm, but when you look at the facts, there’s another story'

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

"Pseudoscience is present when you use the superficial techniques of science, like meta-analysis or randomized trials, in the service of supporting your own beliefs, rather than seeking to refute those beliefs."

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

1/5: Exciting news- we are approaching the halfway point, or 18-month milestone, of the iRISE project! Here's a snapshot of our progress & key outputs to date:

submitted 4 days ago • 1 comment

Which universities have the most retracted articles - and the highest retraction rates? For @nature.com, here's a first-of-its-kind analysis of retractions by institutions. Full details in the story. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 5 days ago • 4 comments

Interesting read shared by @eturnermd1.bsky.social.

submitted 5 days ago • 1 comment

Once again I am forced to send a reminder.

submitted 5 days ago • 3 comments

"I thought I was fairly cynical about the kinds of misconduct that goes on, but it turns out I am not cynical enough." A Q&A with sleuth @nhwise.bsky.social, now working at a publisher.

submitted 5 days ago • 2 comments

Hello @tier2-project.eu you have been added to the Meta-research and Open Science starter pack 2.

submitted 5 days ago • 1 comment

👋, the RestoRes team is delighted to host the Embrace project on its website. While RestoRes focuses on describing challenges regarding research integrity in biomedical research, Embrace develops tools to enhance data sharing—an essential practice for trustworthy research. restores.univ-rennes.fr

submitted 5 days ago • 1 comment

Improving the reports of systematic reviews in sexual medicine

submitted 6 days ago • 0 comments

« Fostering Accountability for the Integrity of Research Studies (FAIRS) « by @deevybee.bsky.social

submitted 8 days ago • 0 comments

I don’t know her but this is pretty damn cool CC @ioanaacristea.bsky.social @floriannaudet.bsky.social @urisohn.bsky.social @datacolada.bsky.social @jsross119.bsky.social

submitted 8 days ago • 1 comment

Ever wondered about the pro and cons of using preprints? So making your work public before peer review finished? See here for more on #JACC position on the matter

submitted 9 days ago • 0 comments

This is the main outcome of the MADRS scale. The values from the ketamine group pass the GRIM test, but nearly all of the control group don't pass the test. I wonder if the control-group is just fake,

submitted 10 days ago • 3 comments

« Preprints: A Revolution in Cardiovascular Science »

submitted 10 days ago • 0 comments

😍 Good to see that an editor is interested in our research on vibration of effects. Oh, no 🤦 it is in a journal that is out of scope... Oh, no again, 😱 it is MDPI. VIBRATION a journal of physics 📳. Common MDPI, do better if you don't want to be called a predatory publisher...

submitted 11 days ago • 1 comment

2nd Royal Society fellow resigns over Musk’s membership, citing the Council’s “inability to take proportionate action on Musk’s promotion of disinformation and attacks on evidence-based policies and science advice”. FRS Andrew Millar, prof of engineering bio at Uni of Edinburgh, confirmed to me.

submitted 11 days ago • 5 comments

« If the Royal Society is really worried about reputational damage, then they should realise that being designated as 'woke' or 'elitist' by your opponents is far less of an insult than being described as cowardly by your friends. » by @deevybee.bsky.social

submitted 12 days ago • 1 comment

Latest blogpost on Musk/Royal Society debacle: deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/02/seve... I look at the reasons that have been given for inaction, and find them wanting. @royalsociety.org

submitted 12 days ago • 27 comments

"Institutions and funders should not incentivize building stunning, improbable, CVs. Our work should aim to make a positive difference for science and for human lives, not selfish priorities and private goals." Via @floriannaudet.bsky.social (il me semble) www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 12 days ago • 1 comment

New highlight in the RestoRes website: « The European Medicines Agency has published revised policies on competing interests »

submitted 12 days ago • 0 comments