gavin.tifosi.social
Sheffield, Yorkshire
212 posts
48 followers
218 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Actually continued to read the thread! Might not be the same place!
comment in response to
post
Reading the thread it looks like it might have been featured on this TV program on BBC iPlayer
What a wonderful find
www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/epis...
comment in response to
post
How extensive?
comment in response to
post
Maybe they could penalise teams that stoke outrage in their own fans?
comment in response to
post
Do lower laps completed indicate anything? If it indicates problems how few laps would be concerning?
comment in response to
post
Is that the pop-up Bar?
comment in response to
post
People talk about sandbagging. I can't think of any reason why this is useful except perhaps when Merc did it in 2014 to avoid possible FIA intervention to even the field.
comment in response to
post
Optimistic and decent. Sounds like a very cautious appraisal
comment in response to
post
It’s Jos suddenly caring about how booing affects drivers feelings.
I don’t buy it
comment in response to
post
This could be a year where we are able to compare driver speed as the cars could be all of similar speed.
I really am looking forward to this season and seeing who performs the best.
comment in response to
post
About ADP: Who’s data is easier for security services to check now because of this change? Are people who want to keep their data private switching to less convenient services?”
comment in response to
post
It’s not that simple. Lots of Brits didn’t like Hamilton’s domination, especially the tabloid press.
We dunk on success. It’s not a great trait.
comment in response to
post
The comment is a bit tongue in cheek.
I agree woke has become a meaningless term.
Do you think Max fans might have accused Lewis fans of being woke in the past?
I just find it amusing that Jos has become awoken to how drivers are sensitive and affected by rival fan’s negativity.
comment in response to
post
I think that’s the cloud of controversy you might be referring to!
comment in response to
post
This is so woke
comment in response to
post
Horner and Red Bull* would be a national treasure in a British Bulldog sort of way if he had a British driver and there wasn’t that cloud of controversy above his head.
* I see Red Bull as a primarily British Racing team
comment in response to
post
Not IRL but here when the mood takes me, maybe…
Your videos are great btw because they often put me in that mood, in other words they make me think.
comment in response to
post
I was talking about Bernie who IMO is infamously mischievous in interviews, which you sort of admitted at the beginning of the video.
Not sure how we got from that to talking about TeamLH, a tedious behaviour I have seen before from others on social media.
comment in response to
post
It was a good video. Just having a dialogue. Is that bad thing?
comment in response to
post
Well if that’s true fair point. I would still say Bernie is trying to get a reaction from what you might categorise as TeamLH fans and even LH himself rather than make points he completely agrees with
Stop the TeamLH mudslinging it’s tedious rather than mischievous like the video was.
comment in response to
post
Who would have thought it, what with this and the swearing stuff, the FIA has clearly become ‘woke’. They will have to sack the President next for his many non woke transgressions.
comment in response to
post
I did watch the video. I was countering your opinion that Bernie is real because IMO a lot of what Bernie says are not his 100% real opinions, he doesn’t say it ‘like it is’
His MO is to be mischievous and disruptive which requires him to do a lot of embellishment.
comment in response to
post
But he wouldn’t do that because he gives zero fks. When people were booing Lewis in 21 he just said close your ears.
comment in response to
post
Point is he still said it because he says things that he doesn’t believe just to get a rise out of people.
comment in response to
post
Bernie said he would take a bullet for Putin
You know what? I don’t think he would!
comment in response to
post
That’s like my grandad’s gentle face when I was being young opinionated and stupid and he was just letting me get on with it because he knew it was just a stage I was going through.
comment in response to
post
I’m trying to give you advice. To be a good engagement farmer you need to be more natural and interesting.
comment in response to
post
If you could engage somewhat like a real person and not like a chatbot I might be interested in continuing.
However I personally find you a bit tedious, I’m not saying you are just how I experience you.
Maybe worth thinking about for future engagements.
comment in response to
post
Oh dear you were doing so well.
comment in response to
post
Maybe “women” only spaces will become like disabled access. Not many people need it but it’s all a bit crap and the people who are not disabled use it anyway. Most people don’t think about disabled access because they are not interested.
comment in response to
post
Sounds fair. What would it mean for society if the ones who based their definition of “women” in ideological/subjective terms became the majority?
comment in response to
post
What would you say if women accepted trans women (what you call men) into their spaces?
comment in response to
post
No. I don’t think you are getting it. Never mind.
comment in response to
post
You’re nearly there. Well done. You have missed a vital point however. Go back re read it and report back.
comment in response to
post
You need to reread the post you replied to.
comment in response to
post
Liberalism in this context means the acceptance that trans women are not men and over time will be accepted as women by women despite not having a womb etc
comment in response to
post
Knock yourself out mate
comment in response to
post
Hello again, go for it knock yourself out.
comment in response to
post
Changing polls and attitudes are like the weather. People used to think homosexuals were paedophiles.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_Be...
comment in response to
post
That’s the wrong statistic. You need to quote the % of sexual violence committed by trans women.
comment in response to
post
Not all men are violent
comment in response to
post
I have concerns about violence in prisons full stop. I wouldn’t limit it to one particular rare situation. Violent prisoners need to be assessed obviously.
comment in response to
post
Polls change, I’m using history as a guide. The inevitable march towards liberalism in the west is unstoppable.
comment in response to
post
Once trans individuals become normalised, and they will, normal people will see them as normal like themselves and they will be accepted.
The only thing I am not certain about, is acceptance of trans women in sport.
comment in response to
post
Most people with those views will be dead in 50 years
comment in response to
post
Knock yourself out
comment in response to
post
Nobody and I mean nobody talks the way you write. Knock yourself out
comment in response to
post
The most bot post I have seen so far. Thanks for the confirmation.
comment in response to
post
I think you need to give me some evidence that you are a human being.
Currently you are being too one dimensional and are presenting an extreme inability to decontextualise knowledge. Also your writing is devoid of humour.
If you want to engage people like me you need to be more interesting.