gladstonebrookes.bsky.social
luv soy, luv seed oils, hate animal abuse. simple as
15 posts
28 followers
84 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Will this be recorded?
comment in response to
post
I flirtered with statistical significance once.
comment in response to
post
@georgiatomova.bsky.social Are the slides from the talk available anywhere? Thanks.
comment in response to
post
Seeing pseudoscientists comparing themselves to Semmelweis or Galileo or whomever always reminds me of this quote by Carl Sagan:
comment in response to
post
Will this be uploaded to YouTube? Thanks.
comment in response to
post
This is a good thing.
comment in response to
post
The values for SFA, MUFA, and PUFA don't add up to the value for total fat for any group or time (~60 g vs. ~70 g, respectively).
comment in response to
post
And link to the original study:
www.thelancet.com/journals/ecl...
comment in response to
post
Review on the health effects of plant-based meat substitutes: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti....
Recent meta-analysis comparing soy milk and cow's milk on markers of cardiometabolic health: bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.....
comment in response to
post
The difference in combined plant milk and meat substitute consumption between vegetarians and the reference group was around 2.2% of total food, and 2.7% of energy. In vegans, the difference was larger.
I.e. easily enough to account for the difference in total UPF intake
comment in response to
post
Differences for vegans were not statistically significant but did have low precision as vegans only made up 0.08% of the study population.
comment in response to
post
After adjustment for covariates, vegetarians consumed 1.3 percentage points more UPF as proportion of daily food intake, and 2.3 pp as percentage of energy intake, compared to regular red meat eaters (consuming more than once a week).
comment in response to
post
Instructions unclear, now have eggs in my hair.