grapesmoker.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

"documentation to follow" is the part that really makes it, I think

submitted 21 days ago • 0 comments

[guy who would rather increase the tent by a handful of racist, fascist bililonaires than any number of leftists voice]:

submitted 29 days ago • 1 comment

the correct position on stancil is that as a thinker-about-politics (or most other things) he's kind of stupid but his heart is generally in the right place so that's fine i guess

submitted 36 days ago • 2 comments

lol these assholes sent me a recruiting email some time ago

submitted 37 days ago • 0 comments

it's very funny because decker is a typical libertarian dipshit and 95% of his posts reflect this. critical support in this one and only case

submitted 38 days ago • 1 comment

the reason matt yglesias is trying to reduce the "salience" of immigration is because he tacitly supports the deportation regime, since it's an exercise in repression against a subaltern population, a thing he supports in general

submitted 38 days ago • 1 comment

the way to understand popularism is that it was always just a war for position within the democratic party itself. none of the so-called popularists had any concrete theory of the case that didn't ultimately reduce to wanting to marginalize the left

submitted 38 days ago • 0 comments

comrade bill continues to cook, those old marxist roots showing themselves

submitted 48 days ago • 0 comments

bill kristol getting to the correct position on immigration before the bulk of the democratic party is some kind of unprecedented fresh hell

submitted 50 days ago • 0 comments

on a more basic level, no, they do not, in fact, matter

submitted 50 days ago • 0 comments

gamer praxis, manifesting

submitted 51 days ago • 0 comments

i must have it. i am the totk treatler

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

tapping the sign so hard it wears out

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

not me, i love to work on the computer

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

you can do both with taylor expansion and discarding higher order terms, the one true method that solves every problem

submitted 52 days ago • 1 comment

look this is not legal advice but i think at this point, if you are that close to the data, you just gotta exfiltrate it in any way you possibly can. i understand not everyone is going to be brave enough to risk this, but we have to stop the mealy-mouthed "it's against the rules akshully" bullshit

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

vulgar freudianism is completely and thoroughly undefeated, the one unambiguously true psychological theory

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

"documentation to follow" is the part that really makes it, I think

[guy who would rather increase the tent by a handful of racist, fascist bililonaires than any number of leftists voice]:

the correct position on stancil is that as a thinker-about-politics (or most other things) he's kind of stupid but his heart is generally in the right place so that's fine i guess

lol these assholes sent me a recruiting email some time ago

it's very funny because decker is a typical libertarian dipshit and 95% of his posts reflect this. critical support in this one and only case

the reason matt yglesias is trying to reduce the "salience" of immigration is because he tacitly supports the deportation regime, since it's an exercise in repression against a subaltern population, a thing he supports in general

the way to understand popularism is that it was always just a war for position within the democratic party itself. none of the so-called popularists had any concrete theory of the case that didn't ultimately reduce to wanting to marginalize the left

comrade bill continues to cook, those old marxist roots showing themselves

bill kristol getting to the correct position on immigration before the bulk of the democratic party is some kind of unprecedented fresh hell

on a more basic level, no, they do not, in fact, matter

gamer praxis, manifesting

i must have it. i am the totk treatler

tapping the sign so hard it wears out

not me, i love to work on the computer

you can do both with taylor expansion and discarding higher order terms, the one true method that solves every problem

look this is not legal advice but i think at this point, if you are that close to the data, you just gotta exfiltrate it in any way you possibly can. i understand not everyone is going to be brave enough to risk this, but we have to stop the mealy-mouthed "it's against the rules akshully" bullshit

vulgar freudianism is completely and thoroughly undefeated, the one unambiguously true psychological theory

bureaucrats are, in fact, our strongest soldiers. in this house we stan the spreadsheet sardaukar

Bill is going back to his roots

i can be mad at anyone for anything actually, and am

we can't do [impossible thing] without [miracle that will never happen]