Profile avatar
gregoryhorowitz.bsky.social
Recovering from 30+ years as a litigator, consumed with hatred for Trump to an unhealthy degree
123 posts 175 followers 163 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Absolutely right, I’ve been wondering when someone would call out this blatant “no evidence” lie. (Compare this to JD Vance’s “first hand accounts” lie in support of his “eating dogs” blood libel.)

She’s got some powerful magic: The first words out of my mouth when she finished were indeed “Jesus Christ”.

What drugs? 🥴

They received presidential pardons for this ‘message’ and it wasn’t seashells on a beach.

FFS please be clear in your analysis. Qatar’s loan of a plane to the DoD isn’t the big problem; their promise to give it outright to the Trump Library for his lifetime use. (What the hell does a presidential library need with 747?)

The real problem with the 747 isn’t Qatar’s “loan” to DoD; it’s the promise to “donate” the plane to Trump’s library thereafter - i.e. promising Trump lifetime use of a flying yacht. Deferring the gift until after Trump’s term doesn’t make it any less of a bribe, an emolument to curry influence.

Strange that nobody is asking the obvious question: Why the hell does a Presidential library need a 747?

Happy to see that Terry Moran took my advice and asked the right follow up. Trump has now unequivocally stated that he could bring Abrego Garcia back if he wanted to, but he won’t do it because he doesn’t like the guy. It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court reacts.

Rubio slyly uses center justification format to make this look like a religious text, when in fact the words are — ironically — far right justification. cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_ful...

An absolute must-read from @stevevladeck.bsky.social this morning: “Just before 1:00 a.m., the justices (aggressively) stepped back into the Alien Enemy Act litigation—in a decision suggesting that a majority understands that these are no longer normal circumstances.”

Calling this a “strongly worded” order is such an understatement. It is a clear eyed and appropriately appalled call to preserve our Constitutional order.

www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/b... Spoiler alert: No, they’re not. Another spoiler: Trump doesn’t really intend to close the carried interest loophole. He’ll say he tried but the Republicans just wouldn’t go for it.

On this first night of Passover, I remember that there are Jews who think the only think wrong about the Holocaust was that Jews were victims, and that “never again” means we can never compare Trump to Hitler, or that Jews must never be the victims again. In other words, many Jews are bad people.

As Passover begins, I am reposting my open letter to Elon Musk. I wrote it in response to his attacks on me and his suggestion that I suffer from “generational trauma.” It has been the most viral piece I have ever written and I continue to be moved by the positive feedback. Thanks and Happy Pesach!

Not that any of the spineless law firms that have “bent the knee” will take this up, but all of their “contracts” with Trump are plainly void as against public policy, see Restatement (2d) of Contracts 178, and have no legal effect.

Do all the law firms that have done deals with Trump, including Paul Weiss et al., know that once a Democrat is in office they will be subject to the same penalties that Trump has inflicted, as will all of their clients, and every partner who was present when the deals were signed?

I hate to say this, and it gives me the chills just to think it, but CECOT is on (and not a short way down) the road to Auschwitz.

David does a good job outlining due process’ practical and moral components www.nytimes.com/2025/04/06/o...

I love seeing reports of all these protests, but have to ask: Wouldn’t the message have been stronger if instead of signs everyone was carrying pitchforks and torches?

Listen, I like all these signs — cute, clever — but wouldn’t the point be better made if everyone showed up with pitchforks and torches?