iandmorrison.com
Disabled accessibility specialist. š¦»š» Policy wonk with a politics degree. Worked in Tv when it was cool. šØš¦ #cdnpoli
373 posts
2,265 followers
2,459 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Fair enough
comment in response to
post
It bothers people quite a bit despite being something out of which this country was formed. Perhaps it offers some perspective.
bsky.app/profile/iand...
comment in response to
post
Nope. Thatās a trade agreement, and was replaced by USMCA. Which was ironically signed by Trump, who now complains about whoever made the deal making the worst deal.
comment in response to
post
Iām was commenting on this 51st state talk, and an economic union as the legal version of that nonsense. It was only ever about the two countries ā not a North American union. The ability to create a union only exists as much as the validity of its sovereignty does, which is a whole separate thread.
comment in response to
post
No it would be like pre-wartime Britain *entering into an economic union with* (not joining) a close trade ally who had not gone full Nazi yet. Ironically, had they, it would have stabilized the German economy and mitigated the impetus for the war.
comment in response to
post
Ya so, I could have phrased this better. My point, in sum: a HYPOTHETICAL union between our countries, however welcome, is only LEGALLY possible via a supranational economic union. Itās crazy to jump straight to 51st state subjugation talk instead of proposing a legal, equally unwelcome, option.
comment in response to
post
Shill.. lol. You must have woken up thinking you were on Twitter. Iāll give you a moment to calm down.
I donāt recall āshillingā for an economic union, I pointed out that itās the only real option AS COMPARED TO 51ST STATE SUBJUGATION NONSENSE insofar as a hypothetical union between our countries.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/iand...
comment in response to
post
If any Rick Mercer account comes here as anything other than @rickmercer.com, we'll know.
comment in response to
post
Imagine comparing the former head of not one but two federal banks to a feckless, unscrupulous career panderer, and being duty bound to conclude that the latter was the better choice. Not only that, but then committing that to the public record. #cdnpoli
comment in response to
post
Great album
comment in response to
post
It is very much understandable. I think it proves a bigger point, though, if we were to sing along to their anthem insteadāfor example. Because, lord knows an American crowd doesnāt know the words to ours.
comment in response to
post
This is mafia behaviour.
comment in response to
post
Another great visual from Abacus' @davidcoletto.bsky.social! š
comment in response to
post
Itās unprecedented and unwritten.. so itās an educated guess I suppose. But it would involve articles 1, 4, and probably then 5. I canāt imagine NATO countries, especially the UK, standing idly by while we were annexed.
comment in response to
post
This graph is showing one day.
comment in response to
post
The good thing is the states control elections, and the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is a state militia to respond to a tyrannical federal government. So š¤·āāļø
comment in response to
post
He said state
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
What a great descriptive text too!