idwagner.bsky.social
Canadian lawyer, liberal/leftie, solar power advocate, addicted to crosswords, bicycles, and democracy.
1,381 posts
691 followers
1,012 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Wowzers. How Cardozo of him.
comment in response to
post
Well she has pretty specific powers.
comment in response to
post
What are you waiting for? Your constitution is clear - "no person" so why are you qualifying it?
comment in response to
post
Dude is ready to throw down. PP would fall over with a push in those lifts.
comment in response to
post
Won't she just force field that baby right out of there?
comment in response to
post
and you can't spell Quisling without the Q.
comment in response to
post
Maundy Thursday becomes Nappy Thursday.
comment in response to
post
Actual garlic is too pungent - it's not roast beast.
comment in response to
post
Just an elaborate way to prove that the loss of the gold standard created the Corporation of the United States of America, I presume.
comment in response to
post
Seriously. Dude you were told over and over again.
comment in response to
post
I go with the first option. Seriously.
comment in response to
post
The China growth of influence is scary. But the rest of the free world must decouple from the USA. What other choice do we have with the current regime? And we can’t trust your electorate.
comment in response to
post
None
comment in response to
post
Come to Canada.
comment in response to
post
You can vote today at your ridings Elections Canada office.
comment in response to
post
I have various recipes. Your grandmother’s is a classic. And if you’re new to lamb it is a can’t miss.
comment in response to
post
I’ve never voted - on election day that is. Why risk getting hit by a bus before the big day? Vote early.
comment in response to
post
Maritimes produce so many great country performers.
comment in response to
post
I was just on Facebook the new attack from the right is why are we worried about Trump. JFC. And the voices from my home town, at least, that bleat the loudest never finished high school. Says something.
comment in response to
post
I watched some found it painful. And I voted and won’t stop door knocking.
comment in response to
post
Indeed.
comment in response to
post
His take is really stupid. Invoking the Magna Carta (which one) to claim that the notwithstanding clause will stop excesses of Kings when it is Parliament that has all the powers that the Lords were objecting the King was using capriciously.
comment in response to
post
To use her like that is deplorable.
comment in response to
post
She’s a fascist.
comment in response to
post
In Canada such conduct by a lawyer is consider “conduct unbecoming” by every Law Society. Perhaps the USA should move to self regulation.
comment in response to
post
In Canada that is conduct unbecoming. Clearly violates our Code(s)of Conduct.
comment in response to
post
The corruption of this AG is huge.
comment in response to
post
I ride on a street that has a multiuse path beside it. But dogs lunging, toddlers veering, and the poor state of the path (spoke breaker) keeps me on the road once the snow melts.
comment in response to
post
Indeed but unfortunately for me mumps, chicken pox, and rubella were not available.
comment in response to
post
She saw the brass ring and now wants one so bad.
comment in response to
post
Yes
comment in response to
post
Zero. Less than 3% of 1st degree murder convicts get parole.
comment in response to
post
He really has a shallow level of knowledge.
comment in response to
post
I experience the visual aspect with my dogs that are alive. I’m so use to them being there that any shadow or change in light is thought to be one of them.
comment in response to
post
How about Toronto or Mexico City instead. You know famous cities not in authoritarian countries.
comment in response to
post
Or
comment in response to
post
Yes Greg he definitely would.
comment in response to
post
Every criminal law we have that violates a section of the Charter is saved by section 1. For example breathalyzer demands. What kind of laws is he proposing that can’t make that analytical framework?
comment in response to
post
Indeed.
comment in response to
post
She slipped up on “alleged.”
comment in response to
post
Big no. Your state doesn’t control the ports of entry.
comment in response to
post
Big no. Because California doesn’t control ports of entry.
comment in response to
post
First I’ve heard of it.
comment in response to
post
Too sweet. I have a memory from 40 years ago.
comment in response to
post
South is in play too. I know a lot more of NDP moved than expected. More will move.
comment in response to
post
Going to takeover the whole country with $10 grand. The delusions of grandeur these putzes have is really astounding.