innovation.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

paying $250 for peer reviews didn't have much of an effect journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/f...

submitted 22 hours ago • 0 comments

Scientists in industry are more likely to rely on the papers of other industrial scientists than similar papers by academics. Could be just an awareness issue, or maybe industrial papers are more credible?

submitted 2 days ago • 2 comments

People don't like micro posts that much, they prefer slightly longer pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10....

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

What may seem like round #1 of this fight is actually round #2 www.washingtonpost.com/national/hea...

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

How do scientists choose which topic to study? Decades of studies on this, but they're dispersed across fields and not synthesized. Fortunately for us, Sidney @sdxiang.bsky.social has written a fantastic review of this literature, focusing on econ and soc lit! direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...

submitted 4 days ago • 2 comments

😳

submitted 5 days ago • 0 comments

Twitter gets more engagement per science post, but in terms of number of science posts, Bluesky has almost caught up www.altmetric.com/blog/bluesky...

submitted 7 days ago • 1 comment

Good news. The file drawer problem, of insignificant results not getting written up and submitted, is shrinking. #openscience #reproducibility #NHST #metascience 🧪 www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....

submitted 11 days ago • 1 comment

The prominent LLMs are almost surely trained on pirated content www.nber.org/papers/w33598

submitted 11 days ago • 0 comments

"We measure VC narcissism based on the size of the signature... appointment of a highly narcissistic VC leads to an overall deterioration in research and teaching performance" www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 16 days ago • 0 comments

Even JP Morgan Chase (!!!) thinks paying to publish is a scam

submitted 16 days ago • 2 comments

I look forward to citing this paper without reading it!

submitted 24 days ago • 0 comments

How accurately do citations reflect the original research? Do authors truly engage with what they cite? In a new study, we analyze millions of citation sentence pairs to measure citation fidelity and how it varies depending on authors’ engagement with prior literature. arxiv.org/abs/2502.20581 ⬇️

submitted 24 days ago • 5 comments

journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

submitted 24 days ago • 0 comments

Guest post: Should Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment be retracted? asks Augustine Brannigan

submitted 25 days ago • 0 comments

Does "spinning" null results to make them sound significant work? Yes. ascopubs.org/doi/full/10....

submitted 27 days ago • 0 comments

Some scientists who use ChatGPT for coding have... odd beliefs about how it works arxiv.org/abs/2502.17348

submitted 37 days ago • 2 comments

Hello Bluesky! We are ICSSI: The 2025 International Conference on the Science of Science and Innovation Save the date! 🗓️ JUNE 16-18, 2025 ✍️ in beautiful Copenhagen, Denmark www.icssi.org

submitted 132 days ago • 3 comments

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 41 days ago • 0 comments

asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

submitted 44 days ago • 1 comment

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

submitted 45 days ago • 0 comments

- The shortest time between a basic science discovery and a drug based on it appearing in the market is 7 years. Mostly it's 11+ years. - Only 5 of the most important drugs were developed with "essentially no input from the public sector". onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...

submitted 46 days ago • 0 comments

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

submitted 52 days ago • 0 comments

Scandinavian scientists seem to have some of the best work-life balance, Chinese scientists some of the worst, as measured by who submits their papers and peer reviews to the BMJ late at night, on weekends, and holidays😅 www.bmj.com/content/367/...

submitted 53 days ago • 1 comment

I have a piece half-done on the entire world of indirect costs. It's too big an endeavor to finish now, in the middle of the night, when this problem that was always a live grenade with a half-pulled pin is suddenly a topic du jour. Shit of a thing. Here are some highlights.

submitted 55 days ago • 12 comments

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

submitted 56 days ago • 0 comments

Join us at #ICSSI2025 in Copenhagen! Our website is now updated, the call for abstracts is online: www.icssi.org 📅 June 16-18, 2025 📍 Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, DK Stay tuned for keynote speaker announcements! #ScienceofScience #Metascience #STS

submitted 63 days ago • 0 comments

Some of the gender gap in funding is explained by how funders value "qualitative methods and, more broadly, interpretive, descriptive and exploratory approaches" journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

submitted 59 days ago • 2 comments

Crowd-workers on MTurk and Prolific are just like me fr Relative to a representative-ish sample of Americans, they - do less housework and care work - spend less time traveling - spend more time at home - spend more time alone journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...

submitted 60 days ago • 1 comment

Seems relevant journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

submitted 64 days ago • 2 comments

UofC students making fun (?) of UofC founder John D Rockefeller

submitted 67 days ago • 0 comments

Science is more engaging when it's funny journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

submitted 67 days ago • 2 comments

Kind of wild that in only ~10 years the NIH shifted from funding mostly basic research to now mostly applied nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2023/10/...

submitted 70 days ago • 0 comments

LLMs don't really have "personalities." Whatever you get by giving it a personality test is very sensitive to minor variations in the prompt arxiv.org/abs/2311.09718

submitted 78 days ago • 0 comments

Department Chair: You are going up for tenure next year. We evaluate candidates based on h-index and citation counts. Faculty member: Say no more...

submitted 87 days ago • 3 comments

With Wikipedia under attack, it's important to remember that its articles source and cite very high quality science AND serve to amplify public access to that science! @wikipdia.bsky.social is probably the best public knowledge repository we have: asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

submitted 94 days ago • 0 comments

The claim that disruptiveness in scientific papers declined over time (Park, Leahey and Funk 2023 in Nature) is apparently due to articles whose reference lists are not indexed researchportal.vub.be/en/publicati...

submitted 106 days ago • 1 comment