Profile avatar
jakemcdermott.bsky.social
Western Electricity Markets guy | he/him | views/opinions are only mine, not my employer’s | Bay State to Bay Area
92 posts 346 followers 407 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

This draft policy decision on M+ is quite the read lemme tell ya

In response to lots of comments on here: If you're taking consumer action against certain newspapers: 1. Consider whether you support the owners in other, more substantial ways. Cancelling your WaPo subscription but use Amazon/have Prime? You've got your order of operations wrong!

Come work with us at the CEC! We're hiring for a bunch of new roles, including this awesome opportunity to manage a very impactful team. This would be a great civil service opportunity for any federal folks looking to make a change too: www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/41...

EXCLUSIVE: A federal worker at the EPA sent an incredible email to Administrator Lee Zeldin. He's refused to stay silent, and has asked me to share the email - and his name - with the public. My latest: www.muellershewrote.com/p/exclusive-...

Bushnell does a good job laying out criticisms of both energy-only and energy+capacity markets. I think he undersells the reliability politics in TX post-URI and hand-waves on “selectively” providing different reliability services to customers (how do you do this when you have bundled 1/

In its fourth quarter report, the Western Energy Imbalance Market indicates it continues to deliver the value of regional coordination through West-wide economic and reliability benefits. Read the news release ➡️ ow.ly/OQUJ50UQunO

I'm also today posting a short paper responding to a report from consultant for rooftop solar industry that disputes my calculations of the rooftop solar cost shift. That report incorrectly argues rooftop solar has actually lowered rates for other customers. faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/borenste/Res...

I’m by no means an insurance expert, but I do wonder what this functionally means for insurance markets in CA. You either have very high premiums for folks living in the highest risk places and shield people in lower risk areas OR You raise everyone’s premiums to higher levels, irrespective of 1/

👀

Wild. Top is the NBC upload, bottom is the one aired as the live feed

Couldn’t help myself but hear a parody in the making: Wait, oh yes, wait a minute, Mr. Risk Manager I’ve been hedging all my trades, But I need a little help today, So please, Mr. Risk Manager, Look over my exposure and tell me if it's right. Look at these contracts I’ve signed.

I started to write a list of possible concerts to go to this year. As I was searching through a show aggregator I realized I know far fewer modern artists than I used to. I am in denial that it’s because my age cohort is no longer determining which artists are “in.”

@resnikoff.bsky.social hits the nail on the head here. It reveals the basic truth that in either outcome, some firms will benefit. The question for me then becomes: which path will benefit everyday people? My answer: the one where we build more housing.