Profile avatar
jakobohlhorst.bsky.social
Epistemologist postdoc at the Extreme Beliefs Group at VU Amsterdam I know about Virtues, Wittgenstein, Extremism, Philosophy of Psychology & Conceptual Engineering
88 posts 406 followers 463 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

TIS ThDPsSSSPs

It’s over infinitists and foundationalists, the steel industry is going to bat for coherentism to accelerate to full circularity.

My theoretical philosophy brain: What's the political equivalent of having been raised in a monochrome environment and never having seen the colour red?

Did you ever wonder what electromagnetism is? We all know about current and fields, but this is too abstract. At least they it was for me. Well, it's like a vortex in water, but with a bunch of ball bearings in between. From the start: Nancy Nersessian wrote a wonderful book!

Given that indoctrination now is policy-relevant, my excellent colleague Chris Ranalli just published the book to go with it.

If you're still on the fence about getting it, there are now two great discussions of the book by Giorgio Volpe (doi.org/10.1007/s442...) and by Allan Hazlett (doi.org/10.1007/s442...) as part of a Symposium at the Asian Journal of Philosphy. There'll be a reply at some point.

My Cambridge Element on Irrationality is out, and open access for a month! In it I discuss akrasia, conspiracy beliefs, self-deception, delusion, and implicit bias. www.cambridge.org/core/element...

thinking of founding the Pascal’s wager optimal religion: so generic that any kind of faith will count, but lack of faith meaning eternal damnation. It would immediately capture all the new rationalists and effective altruists

I'm sure you've all already read my book , given that the digital version is open access. This should have convinced you that you actually need a hard copy. Well luckily, it's coming out as paperback, for an a bit more civil price than the hard cover! (also there seems to be a sale)

And one Naomi Klein

@sconinxphil.bsky.social Is here now!

Me at Newman House, summoning the spirit of Wittgenstein to duke it out with John Henry Newman regarding quasi-fideism.

Publication day! My latest paper is (finally) out. Here, I introduce a multidimensional framework to taxonomise different states of minimal awareness across sleep and wakefulness. And with this, all the material from my PhD is published :) philosophymindscience.org/index.php/ph...

We all know about the debates around akrasia as a state, but is anybody contemporarily defending weakness of will as a character flaw/trait? #philsky

xphi-Europe 2025 conference t.co/WHQDnIlgT2

Newman has a theory of faith as being based on unjustifiable assent. He offers a solution how to deal with heresy, but it doesn't deal with fundamentalism as a kind of morally bad assent. This problem extends to ordinary assent, raising the question how we recognise morally bad fundamental beliefs.