Profile avatar
jocelynmaclure.bsky.social
Philosophy Professor, Jarislowsky Chair in Human Nature & Technology, McGill University https://www.mcgill.ca/jarislowsky-chair/ Président, Commission de l’éthique en science et en technologie du Québec, 2017-2024
100 posts 1,457 followers 925 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Institutional Epistemology Workshop 2025, June 18-19, University of Helsinki. Our invited speakers this year are Helen Beebee, Jessica Brown, and @kevinzollman.com . We look forward to receiving your abstracts by March 10. More information here: www.institutionalepistemology.net #philsci #philsky

Je n’ai pas suivi avec attention l’évolution des revues d’idées québécoises depuis que j’ai quitté (il y a longtemps déjà) Nouveau Projet. Quels sont les magazines actuels les plus intéressants, qui publient des textes qui ne sont pas nécessairement politiques?

Très beau texte. À lire, en particulier pour ceux qui, comme moi, connaissent mal la vie et l’œuvre de Marc Bloch.

I was so appalled by Vance’s Munich speech that I overlooked his cringe joke on G. Thunberg. ‘´If American democracy can survive 10 years of Greta Thunberg scolding, you guys can survive a few months of Elon Musk’´. Wow, who’s the snowflake now.

Texte important du professeur @jocelynmaclure.bsky.social. Il nous invite, notamment, à " repenser les conditions de la rationalité, du savoir et de la discussion libre dans les circonstances qui sont les nôtres".

Nouveau texte dans La Presse+: l’autonomie rationnelle et la pensée critique sont souvent présentées comme des antidotes à la désinformation, à la manipulation et aux chambres d’écho.

"Nous devons nous réconcilier avec notre dépendance épistémique radicale, c-à-d le fait que nos croyances dépendent lourdement du témoignage des autres et des savoirs produits par les institutions. La dépendance épistémique nous rend vulnérables." @jocelynmaclure.bsky.social in @lapresse.ca

This is why we need trained philosophers in public policy, both inside and outside academia. ‘´Contrary to the claim once made by Milton Friedman, positive analysis (what is) cannot be separated from normative claims (what ought to be).´

Been waiting all my adult life for a new Golden Age in Arts and Culture.

“One way of saying this is that until just the other day there was really no such thing as U.S. manufacturing, Canadian manufacturing or Mexican manufacturing, just North American manufacturing — a highly efficient, mutually beneficial system that sprawled across the three nations’ borders.”

Giving online talk on “Ethics in Academic Publishing” at the SJ Center for Business Ethics on Feb. 10 at 5pm EST. I’ll be discussing the crisis of for-profit academic journal publishing, the emerging diamond open access alternative, and what we can do. You can register to attend online here:

How can liberal #democracies respond to the rise of right-wing #populism? Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views by Gabriele Badano & @alasianuti.bsky.social (Oxford Academic) reviewed by @andrewshorten.bsky.social @politics-ul.bsky.social 👇

The Journal Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de politiques has a CFP for a special issue on AI Safety and Public Policy in Canada. Research coming from all relevant disciplines are welcome. I was asked to serve on the guest editorial committee to advise on AI Ethics papers.

Timely speech by a superb movie director (via Patrick Weil) m.youtube.com/watch?si=Jsr...

Quand @janictremblay.bsky.social s’entretient avec le prof Chapoutot sur la contemporanéité du nazisme, ça donne une entrevue à écouter ici: ici.radio-canada.ca/ohdio/premie...

As far as I can tell from this interview, I don’t fully share Mark Lemley’s views on LLMs, but this is this is the right kind of attitude :

Institutional Epistemology Workshop 2025, June 18-19, University of Helsinki. Our invited speakers this year are Helen Beebee, Jessica Brown, and @kevinzollman.com . Find the call for abstracts here: www.institutionalepistemology.net #philsci #philsky

Excited about this article coming out. Timely study of how to engage with people we think are echo-chambered. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

If you watch only one short video today, make it this one. Remarkable bravery, and the looks on the various faces could be material for a dissertation on gender, the family, and authoritarianism. youtu.be/gVInX42IQD8?...

Recklessness

Next Jarislowsky Chair in Human Nature and Technology work-in-progress seminar: Virginie Simoneau-Gilbert (PhD candidate, Oxford), "Empathy in Animals: Its Epistemic Moral Relevance and Limitations", Jan 31, 3:30. To obtain a copy of the paper: www.mcgill.ca/jarislowsky-...

Epistemic democrats say the legitimacy of democracy depends on its ability to make good decisions. If voters are incompetent, we should abandon democracy. Critics say this is a problem. I say: let's gamble democracy on epistemology! Now forthcoming in Episteme! philpapers.org/rec/HANBDO-4

Happy that The Economist is covering advance medical assistance in dying requests in Quebec in its latest issue. I was the co-chair of the panel of experts that recommended allowing patients who will lose their capacity to make informed medical decisions to request MAID in advance.

It’s hard to be hopeful these days, but President Boric’s take down of the broligachy at the wonderful Congreso Futuro was a boon.