Profile avatar
judgewhohe.bsky.social
English lawyer and judge. Architecturally inclined.
62 posts 158 followers 91 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Increasingly, tenants are being told by local authorities not to vacate their property under a s.21 notice until court order. But that now incurs a cost of the £404 court fee + fixed costs, which is then passed onto the tenant at the most financially precarious time in their life.

I likewise credit this immense groove for a lifelong obsession with all things jazz-funk. A great dissection here for the music geeks. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMtG...

"Litigants in person must not think that by writing emails to a court office during ongoing proceedings, they will receive legal advice in response. Furthermore, an email raising questions about their case is not the same as a formal application for determination by a judge." (¶42) 100 times yes.

Some clearer guidance for family bundles would also be welcome. Of my 6 cases today, one had a 961-page core bundle and a 1,298-page 'supplemental' bundle. Another had a mere 462-page core bundle but also a 1,076-page disclosure bundle. It can be tough to find the wood for the (many, many) trees.

The improbably lovely Hinsdale County Courthouse (1877) is Colorado's oldest courthouse still used for its originally intended purpose and a rare surviving example of a frame courthouse building. Even rarer perhaps are the multiple deer heads adorning the courtroom interior.

There is a high probability that this was an AI generated hallucination; "The two page 'summary' was written in a style that made me think the author was a lawyer familiar with the Judgments Regulation, but whose first language is not English."(§103)

1/4 I often need to remind advocates of the importance of liaising with a litigant-in-person opponent prior to a hearing. This includes handing them a printed copy of a skeleton argument or position statement and explaining what it is. It is both professional and a basic courtesy.

The DLR needs to up its game as a matter of urgency.

"Further, the court ORDERS that, on or before December 31, 2024, counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendants are to go to lunch together. Plaintiff’s counsel will pay the bill; Defendants’ counsel will leave the tip.” Must have missed that in CPR r.3.9.

An absolutely gangbusters bit of court architecture. Caen’s New (2015) Law Courts possess clear spatial planning and purist aesthetics. Not to mention a tree in the the circular central atrium spanning all 5 floors. It makes me miss Truro's erstwhile foliage. www.archdaily.com/793047/new-l...

The iconic roof of the Antwerp Law Courts (2005) bears more than a passing resemblance to Star Wars' T-4a Imperial Shuttle.

A slim but important and illuminating read on the experience of LiPs in the County Court from @leader-kate.bsky.social I would recommend it to lawyers and judges alike. Cracking cover too.

Limitations and risks of AI in the justice system highlighted once more. "Prosecutors and judges may rely on AI-generated content for critical decisions without fully grasping its limitations or biases...at trial, he notes the challenges in cross-examining opaque AI-generated content."