Profile avatar
karantripathi.bsky.social
PhD at University of Cambridge, MSc at University of Oxford. Researching intersection of programmable computational infrastructures and criminal justice.
41 posts 104 followers 319 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Police tech providers in India are moving from “here’s our product” to “you can’t do it without us” - I’m guessing what would be the obvious next step!

Indian state of UP spent 400 million INR to procure “AI crowd management tool” which was only used for counting footfall. Despite this, a tragic stampede took place where hundreds (still counting) lost their lives. Later, more money was spent in pushing positive ads for “digital kumbh”

Senior police officers in India call themselves “data fiduciaries”, but in the same breath go on to share their visions of a data warehouse that integrates static and real-time data from both state and private entities (delivery apps, e-commerce apps, home IOTs).

Funny how European scholars keep using “risk profiles” instead of “control profiles” to refer to group-based profiling of people. ‘Risk’ both sanitises and legitimises the deeply political, dehumanising, and subjugating logics (and legacies) of racialised group-based profiling.

Love archival research - as someone who does empirical research in criminal justice, archives (to an extent) are the least triggering, traumatising, and exhausting, source for data. Fun fact: colonial archives are more easily accessible than postcolonial ones 💀

Digital infrastructures in policing - both materially and symbolically - are mobilised arbitrarily. ‘Efficiency’, thereby, both in its functional and discursive operation, is multivalent, fluid, contingent to the context in which it is invoked - becoming complicit in punitive-political policing

From the Field: “We don’t use them much, given Delhi’s traffic, we prefer bikes or our normal cars … they’re too big, if we use them, we’ll never reach the spot in time” … “but they look cool, right? mostly for the show, I’d say” - patrol officers on the new “mobile” high-tech fleet.

My observations from the field reveals how a combination of road infrastructure, driving habits, ease of obtaining fake number plates, traffic, dust pollution, and monkeys, disrupt the seamless sociotechnical imaginaries of Automatic Number Plate Reader (ANPR) cameras in a Himalayan state.

In India, it’s really difficult to do quant research on criminal justice decision-making. Not just due to access, but sheer terrible recording practices. Judges often omit vital details while recording orders/judgements - making secondary data analysis very unreliable

Honored to have my work on sentence review of lifers in India featured in this article by the Institute of Criminology @cambridgeuni.bsky.social Grateful for the opportunity to be interviewed for this piece and share insights on how my research contributed to the release of a lifer after 26 years!

Hybridisation of public/security/policing infrastructures is not just the question of efficiency, but also of politics of recognition, resistance, and redemption.

Notes from the field: immune (so far) from race to algorithmic policing, this police station in a hilly state in India still uses pin-maps for patrol allocations

Notes from the field: I was surprised to see how the neatly drawn boundaries of public-private divide collapse in digital policing projects. (1/2)

From the fieldwork: software engineers in India’s state-owned computing agency reveal the ‘boundary-work’ required to work on policing projects. One theme is the value of having a govt job - the prestige it brings. So one must focus on the task and not the “noise”, on the code and not the coded

Is researcher dysphoria a thing?

My paper in Punishment & Society discusses sentence review decision-making for life prisoners in India. Based on findings from quant-qual sequential design, I argue that SRB significantly violates lifers’ right to meaningful consideration for early release. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...