Profile avatar
kexelchabot.bsky.social
Professor of Law @ Marquette. Is the administrative state history?
90 posts 4,688 followers 274 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

My latest. What Americans were thinking when the 13th amendment was ratified (and it was not about what became Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment). wm.billofrightsjournal.org/wp-content/u...

Excited to see my Michigan Journal of Law Reform Article cited in The New York Times! www.nytimes.com/2025/03/10/u... Inspired by an amazing symposium panel at UM Law. @jedshug.bsky.social @jdmortenson.bsky.social @andreascoseriakatz.bsky.social @blakeprof.bsky.social @womenknowlaw.bsky.social

Very excited that Rejecting the Unitary Executive is forthcoming in the Utah Law Review (Fall 2025)! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... Here’s a 🧵outlining key arguments in the paper:

Thank you @lsolum.bsky.social for the “highly recommended”!! — and sorry to have missed it earlier 🤓 For those who haven’t yet looked at the piece, @rickhills.bsky.social and I remain eager for your comments. (And thank you again to the students @dukelaw.bsky.social for accepting the piece!!)

Thanks so much for the shoutouts! Independent regulatory structures have been with us since the founding. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... Trump’s unitary arguments are asking the courts to rewrite history and the Constitution.

1/ I spent 90 minutes talking to Akhil Amar on his podcast about impoundments and the congressional power of the purse. This is, in my view, hugely important. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a...

Call for Papers (3/7 deadline) — ABA Administrative Law Live Spring Conference (Washington, DC): www.yalejreg.com/nc/call-for-...

Really glad we have a strong unitary executive theory in place to ensure a government of laws not men

My 2019 book, THE PUBLIC’S LAW, is finally out in paperback. Back then, I diagnosed the Schmittian turn in US Public Law, warning against a future “Weimar-on-Potomac.” Alas, here we are. Check it out to better understand our predicament and imagine better, Progressive democracy. a.co/d/7XieLB3

The argument that historical understandings of Article II vest a “conclusive” and “preclusive” power of impoundment in the President is sanctionable.

constitutioncenter.org/news-debate/...

Re-upping in light of yet another well-deserved loss for a truly wretched piece of anti-constitutional nonsense lpeproject.org/blog/the-ant...

An important, essential column. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/o...

Here’s a 🧵 re-upping some of my recent scholarship on Congress’s power of the purse:

www.cnn.com/2025/01/30/b... Enjoyed talking to CNN about the constitutionality of the Fed and the Sinking Fund Commission.

I'm thrilled to report that my forthcoming book, We the Men: How Forgetting Women's Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality, is the number 1 new release in Gender & the Law on Amazon. #WetheMen shorturl.at/PaTnF

The unitary executive theory for an *unconditional* *absolute* presidential power to fire officers is a manufactured myth. I am ready w/ my amicus brief from SEC v. Jarkesy showing their anti-originalism & misuse of Founding-era sources. Who wants my help for free? papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

The effects could reach far beyond IGs if the Court takes issue with reason-giving requirements. Presidents of regional federal reserve banks who sit on the FOMC are also subject to reason-giving requirements upon removal by the Fed's Board of Governors. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Catching up on some work at Starbucks. They still have gingerbread cold foam!