Profile avatar
landonwarder.bsky.social
PhD candidate at the Atlantic Veterinary College working on measuring antimicrobial use on dairy farms and how that shapes the microbiome. I also love curling to no end. šŸ®šŸ„Œ
23 posts 140 followers 13 following
Regular Contributor

New: Last night, hundreds of CDC post-doc fellows were fired, including all in the group who call themselves the "disease detectors," and are the future of public health lab leaders. One senior official told me, "It is going to cripple public health for decades." www.nbcnews.com/politics/dog...

They finally released the data on H5N1 infections of cow vets. My main take away is that this is good news (low virulence and contagiousness, though influenzas change quickly) so why did it have to be delayed a month? What would have happened if it was scary? www.npr.org/sections/sho...

ā€œThis, too, shall passā€ is as much a warning as a consolation. Society does best when people plant trees they will never sit in the shade of. As terrible as a moment may feel, plan for a better tomorrow.

All cases of bird flu in dairy cows had seemed to come from one transmission eventā€¦ until now. I still think this is just an issue for dairy farms, but itā€™d be nice if the US had a functional CDC. www.reuters.com/business/hea...

I havenā€™t had an update on H5N1 in dairy vets, but, seeing as all the data sets from the CDC are down, I doubt they will be talking anytime soon. The difference is people outside the organization do know the results, but arenā€™t talking. I think itā€™s been long enough that decorum can be put aside.

I was supposed to sit in on a webinar about veterinarians getting exposed to H5N1 on dairy farms with the first data, but it got cancelled because the CDC isnā€™t allowed to communicate findings. People on the call that saw the data said itā€™s interesting but none of us at risk get to know about it.

I read ā€œ3 Body Problemā€ and thought it was interesting that aliens would neuter our science to make us vulnerable, then I realized that the COVID blowback did that specifically for epidemiology. If a biological weapon gets deployed, weā€™re done.

Trust is one of the most undervalued resources in many fields, but especially agriculture

Blinding white with shades of pain described me similarly to many others this morning for very different reasons, but comforting nonetheless

I realized I havenā€™t posted my own science, so here is my favourite. Itā€™s open access. www.frontiersin.org/journals/vet...

There is concern about Bovaer in cattle feed which reduces methane emissions and improves efficiency but people are concerned about it passing through in the milk. I think this concern is overblown, but I will always be for increasing the scale of bromoform-containing seaweed supplementation.

Money in science can certainly cause problems, but the issues people are scared of I think are overblown. The biggest issue I see is the lack of funding for replication studies and the hesitancy to publish negative results

Iā€™m only somewhat worried about the imminent relaxation of laws around retail raw milk. People are going to get sick and worse, but I see enough people complain about pasteurized milk spoiling early that Iā€™m pretty sure all those health rebels are going to give up when the poop bacteria takes over.

If someone is emotionally attached to a view of theirā€™s, an attack on their view is seen as an attack on the person. This is not a feature of dumb people or illogical people. It is a feature of people. Remember that you are more than your beliefs.

I read this paper a few weeks ago about the anthropology of Albertan dairy farmers. Seeing an outside perspective is like realizing that water is wet. Itā€™s rare to feel truly edified from a paper. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

The variation in human intelligence is smaller than you think

I find it interesting that in livestock antibiotic use research, studies that look for an effect on human outcomes tend to find a relationship, but studies that look for a mechanism canā€™t find anything. Iā€™m assuming that it is because of several weak effects, but there also might be a white whale

Nature has no obligation to fit into human-intelligible categories

I know Bluesky is quite a pro-science platform, but, for anyone who is skeptical about science due to the influence of funders: What proportion of studies do you think are entirely fake? What proportion of studies do you think are more subtly altered? What fields do you think are most affected?