Profile avatar
mathieucarpentier.bsky.social
Professeur de droit public / Professor of Public Law (Université Toulouse Capitole) Droit, philosophie, philosophie du droit Law, philosophy, philosophy of law
2,412 posts 2,251 followers 373 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
Posts 9 Comments 41

A comparative analysis of the reasoning in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 and in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) could be interesting.

submitted 5 hours ago • 0 comments

Publication day! 'The Principle of Legality: A Moral Theory' is now out in the world. Perfect for your undergraduate public law reading lists and children's birthday presents. Feeling immensely grateful to friends and colleagues for the years of support during the writing of this. <3

submitted 6 days ago • 0 comments

Slippery slope arguments usually are a fallacy... ...except when the slope is, in fact, slippery, and the owner of the slope tells you it's slippery, and everybody has started slipping down the f*ing slope already.

submitted 14 hours ago • 2 comments

[HELP] Il y a une contrepèterie dans l'Album de la Comtesse de cette semaine que je n'arrive pas à résoudre. C'est la première fois depuis 1999. Je n'en dors plus de la nuit. Le désespoir me conduit donc à solliciter votre aide. "La valseuse calée"

submitted 3 days ago • 5 comments

"What I do not concede to the state, to wit, the right to restrict the freedom of research and of expression, I cannot concede either to a political party, by voluntary submission to its discipline." (Hans Kelsen)

submitted 575 days ago • 0 comments

Legal Theory Bookworm: "Judicial Bricolage," edited by Groppi, Ponthoreau, & Spigno, buff.ly/V8M0sJ7 - The Legal Theory Bookworm recommends Judicial Bricolage: The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges in the 21st Century.

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

John Finnis's memoir of Joseph Raz has been published at the British Academy. A fitting tribute from a friend for over 50 years. www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publishing/m...

submitted 5 days ago • 0 comments

Quelqu'un pour m'expliquer pourquoi le ministère retient encore les postes au 46 1°? Il est piquant que l'un de seuls postes publiés en section 02 soit celui de P1, alors que celle-ci n'a mis qu'un seul poste à l'agrégation au cours de son histoire...

submitted 6 days ago • 0 comments

It's official, we're living in a Seinfeld simulation.

submitted 6 days ago • 1 comment