miltfarquhar.bsky.social
Hot-haired wokester with a pleasing gait. “One of the best kisses I’ve ever had” - anon.
He/him. Deal with it, y’fuckin plum.
2,592 posts
610 followers
614 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Aye. Sadly. I think he’s got it in him when fit and when well serviced, but just as things were beginning to go that way, well his lego bits fell off again. I think the goodwill has dried up, rightly or wrongly.
comment in response to
post
We’re the new kings of everything, until Wolves beat us.
comment in response to
post
Keane would’ve been on to shore up the defeat.
comment in response to
post
Get a fucking iPad, Brentford.
comment in response to
post
Undecided. You’ve aged well.
comment in response to
post
Yep, early decision and just do it. That’s the hallmark of forwards like us, Sean. One touch and BANG. Like our respective sex lives, in some respects.
comment in response to
post
You sounds surprised…?
comment in response to
post
Defo. Fist through the sideboard with all the best china and the Princess Diana plates because SHE wants salmon en croute tonight, rather than the fucking curry we’re SUPPOSED to have. She KNOWS I have jalfrezi on a Thursday. Well I f she wants samminonfuckincroot, she can have it off broken plates.
comment in response to
post
Brian May is a great name for a cat. My good lady had neighbours who called their cat Vulcan Maguire.
comment in response to
post
Every footballer is a cheat. All of them. From claiming for throw-ins they know aren’t theirs, to feigning contact to the face, tumbling in the box, to being entitled to go down. Every time they do it, they’re trying to con the ref to buy an advantage. Young is no worse than any of them.
comment in response to
post
Exactly. Don’t engage. Don’t argue. Just block. Let them chat to themselves.
comment in response to
post
I heard he was using the escalator to make an omelette. That’s all the detail I have at this stage.
comment in response to
post
Arf! THERE he is!
comment in response to
post
Old Skool!
comment in response to
post
“Greetings! I hope this finds you well!”
comment in response to
post
Aye. But people won’t. “But Copilot said…” will be echoing around the courts for decades.
comment in response to
post
Yep. Tell it what it needs to know. Any more clouds the output, too much and it hallucinates.
comment in response to
post
What’s your favourite… space… hat?
I’m sorry. I’ve got nothing, I just wanted to be a part of things and instead I’ve basically just crapped myself on the internet. Erm… can I have your autograph or something? As compensation, like?
[does CompoFace for The Mirror]
comment in response to
post
Ahh mate. Sorry to hear that.
comment in response to
post
Aye, that’s it. It’s only as good as the prompts it gets. There’ll be an explosion in the “Prompt Engineer” market, i reckon - people who are really good at writing simple prompts. Or are really good at convincing others they can “add value” by doing it. I hate them already.
comment in response to
post
Krekt. One of the big worries is how easy it’ll be to manipulate large of groups of people into thinking 1=2. If AI tells them, and the available data points that way - it’ll only cement the position of strength that those who benefit from falling standards of critical thinking already enjoy.
comment in response to
post
That’s true, but “just being able to parse” is doing a lot of work, there. Get 100 people to ask about a single topic and you get some incredible output and some utter shite.
I think it’s exciting, but it also scares me and there are so many ethical grey areas. We’ll fuck it up.
comment in response to
post
Our work have had me testing it. I’ve found the best results come from talking to it like it’s an intelligent person who knows nothing about what you’re asking it to research. Simple language, a defined and finite dataset, and constant revisiting of the output - if it’s crap, why is it crap.
comment in response to
post
Very true. Its two biggest potential flaws are the quality of the prompting and the access to sufficient data. Qualitative output is effectively probability, wrapped up in floral language - but it can do a really good job of hiding that.
comment in response to
post
Aye, and it certainly won’t be kept away from creativity. As with anything like this, people will see usage guardrails as something to vault, especially if there’s money to be made from it.
comment in response to
post
It was cracking, that.
comment in response to
post
I haven’t watched the second episode yet, but he’s an early forerunner for “probably going to be the biggest twat in the show, amid strong competition from his son and weird wealthy angry man.”
comment in response to
post
I was on the wrong tab. Gotcha.
comment in response to
post
This spreadsheet… talk me through it, spare no detail.
comment in response to
post
Aye aye, Paddington’s had a lager top.
comment in response to
post
Angry eyeliner guy. I liked his LADZ speech yesterday. “Grab a ‘beer’, be a bloody bloke”. The teddy-bear headed bellend probably gets someone in to put shelves up.
comment in response to
post
“As long as I know how to love, I know I’ll stay alive…”
comment in response to
post
“State of his arse in that cassock…”
comment in response to
post
That’s the best shout.
comment in response to
post
You’re not watching Four Killers At The Window, are you…?
comment in response to
post
It’d be a giveaway if I was on the case. “I saw you looking at us out of the window. What was THAT about? Something to hide…?”
comment in response to
post
You just can’t do right for doing wrong in this place.
comment in response to
post
You ask, I deliver.
comment in response to
post
He tried to buy two penalties. Which makes him no different to any player, they’re all fucking cheats - but getting involved in Branthwaite’s injury at the end, someone should’ve spread his nose for him.
comment in response to
post
From the days when their music always sounded like something terrifying was about to happen.