Profile avatar
moiradonegan.bsky.social
Opinion columnist covering gender and politics at The Guardian. Writer in residence at the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research. Host of the podcast In Bed with the Right. Real piece of work.
3,544 posts 80,378 followers 972 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Going to start doing RETVRN posting for basic government functioning. Going “this is what they took from you” and it’s a childhood vaccine schedule and pasteurized milk without any manure in it.

Of course, the desire to humiliate Dworkin in sexual terms is not in spite of her anti-rape activism, but directly because of it. Hierarchical, domineering, misogynist sex is what she threatened, and so that is what she is threatened with.

I loved talking right wing sex positivity and the contradictory landscape of MAGA desire with @adriandaub.bsky.social and the hilarious and lovely @mattxiv.bsky.social ✨ podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...

Very cool that these people have unchecked power over all the money and all the capacity for violence.

Why are a ton of people suddenly liking a blog I wrote in 2023. Where did they find it. Where are they coming from.

I honestly do think that part of the solution will be swift, dramatic, and yes, perhaps sometimes violent punishment of anti-democratic and anti-pluralist views.

Need to write about rape apologist feminisms that aim to downplay sexual degradation and violence—and how they have enabled the jocular misogyny and pro-rape agenda of Trumpist gender politics.

… Paul Clement?

Not long ago a prominent literary magazine published a piece about Andrea Dworkin that speculated that she came to her anti-rape politics because she wasn’t having sex correctly or enough. I’m not going to link it but was pretty egregious—little more than a critical fig leaf for revenge porn.

The right wing woman is not insincere in her politics, but she *is* tactical: she believes that sexual and reproductive service to right wing men will earn her their protection, affection, and material support. She is wrong.

Important to start admitting that we’re living under Schrodinger’s constitution—one that is not in effect whenever it constrains Republican powers, but is in effect whenever it can be used to stymie democrats or suppress opposition.

This could be one way that the Trump administration attacks abortion access, which in red states is now largely conducted by sending pills through the mail.

I’m rooting for the drugs.

I was listening to this it seems to me that this case explains an enormous amount about our world today

Coward.

What is a good place to eat in Austin, Texas?