Profile avatar
neeleengelmann.bsky.social
cognitive scientist. postdoc at center for humans and machines, MPI for human development, Berlin. Interested in moral psychology, human-AI interaction, (experimental) philosophy and other things. neeleengelmann.com
72 posts 498 followers 393 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

🚨 Call for Proposals: DFG Priority Programme “Rethinking Disinformation (Re:DIS)” (SPP 2573) The DFG invites interdisciplinary research on disinformation from an epistemic perspective. 🗓 Deadline: 1 Nov 2025 📍 Online info roundtable: 27 June 2025, 4–8pm CET www.dfg.de/de/aktuelles...

Wir öffnen unsere Türen zur Langen Nacht der Wissenschaften! ✨ Vielfältiges Programm für Groß & Klein – kommt vorbei! 📍 Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin (Lentzeallee 94) 📆 28. Juni 2025 💸 Jubiläumstickets online: nur 5 € 🔗 Programm: www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/2047157/prog...

Fresh in #PNAS: The final paper from my PhD is out! We experimentally study how delegation to artificial agents affects cooperation in a collective-risk dilemma. Read the full paper → doi.org/10.1073/pnas...

Do AI builders hold different values from AI users? We show that AI builders and men are more utilitarian and less supportive of pro-diversity outputs, highlighting ongoing concerns about workforce diversity and whose values are shaping AI. tinyurl.com/AIcognit

We often have to judge who is knowledgeable—precisely when we are not. Can humans really do that? Our new paper in Psychological Science shows that, surprisingly, we can. drive.google.com/file/d/1b15E...

YouTube Auto translate doing the classic XKCD ass-car thing, I love it. They even translated it to a closed compound 👌

that's a nice direct commute you have there. Would be a shame if anything happened to it (and turned it into 3 different subway lines + 1 bus) 😭

Ok, time for a short thread about this paper. My sense over the past six months or so is that chain-of-thought prompting as used in e.g. ChatGPT o.3 improves substantially upon previous systems such as ChatGPT 4.o, at least for certain tasks. But how revolutionary is it?

Are you interested in the governance of emergent tech? Come & work w/ me @bmittelstadt.bsky.social & @cruss.bsky.social We are looking for 3 Post Docs in Law: tinyurl.com/4rbhcndp Ethics: tinyurl.com/yc2e2km4 Computer Science/AI/ML: tinyurl.com/yr5bvnn5 Application deadline is June 15, 2025.

starting into the week like.... 🪱

If I'm ever tempted to use Qualtrics for anything else than the simplest of surveys again, I need someone to remind me to shoot myself in the foot instead 👍🙏

Might consent morally transform some human interactions but not others? In our new article in @cognitionjournal.bsky.social, @jorgesuarezm.bsky.social, @ivarr.bsky.social, and I explore whether the information consent conveys may be at odds with normative standards in the sexual domain. 🧵

Please spread the word! Psych Science is recruiting volunteers to help conduct computational reproducibility checks. If you have experience writing reproducible analysis scripts in psychology, and want to join the team, please apply! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...

Auch nominiert für das beste Forschungsumfeld: humanet3. Das Team forscht zur digitalen #Transformation und ist eine gemeinsame Forschungsgruppe der Max-Planck-Institute @mpil.de, @mpi-inno-comp.bsky.social und @mpib-berlin.bsky.social. 📲 👉 www.diejungeakademie.de/de/projekte/...

Are people more likely to consider a statement a lie if the stakes (or the moral consequences) are higher? Research by Shurakov & Wiegmann suggests this influence is, at most, small, and the folk concept of what is/isn’t a lie is robust: buff.ly/Y4CDrLH

Breaking news: There will soon be a specialist journal devoted to the interdisciplinary field of EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY This will be enormously valuable to the field

🔥Exciting news in experimental philosophy🔥 Very happy to announce that there will be soon a new journal named “Experimental Philosophy”. It will be open access, free of charge for authors and follow all Open Science principles. Editors and Editorial Board below. More information coming soon...

We’re back to the “hundreds of psychological studies cannot all be wrong, educate yourself”-stage of discourse. I recommend that onlookers to this discourse pick some of the cited studies & see how compelling they find them, wrt causal identification & strength of statistical evidence.>

The role of stakes in lying: An empirical investigation of the robustness of the folk concept of lying: https://osf.io/f68qj

New paper for #CogSci2025: People cheat more when they delegate to AI. How can we stop this? We tested: 🧠 Explaining what the AI does (transparency) 🗣️ Calling cheating what it is (framing) Only one worked. w/ @larakirfel.bsky.social, Anne-Marie Nussberger, Raluca Rilla & @iyadrahwan.bsky.social

🧵New paper out in Cognition Why do people moralize harmless carnal sins (e.g. gluttony, masturbation)? @danielnettle.bsky.social & I find that these behaviors activate reciprocity-based moral judgment—no need for a distinct "purity" module. 50 days free link: authors.elsevier.com/a/1l18D2Hx2-...

Now out @ Journal of Research in Personality (free until June): authors.elsevier.com/a/1k%7EqWL4L... We found evidence that trait empathy correlates with purposivism in rule violation judgments. Also: most people share a single concept that seems to have a dual character structure.

Challenging AI-hype with @jimaceverett.bsky.social and charting a more responsible and virtuous course #aiethics

the view at the train station when you're apparently the very last person in your town to leave for the holidays 🛴🛴🛴 happy easter!

Can confirm that my NSF grant "How False Beliefs Form & How to Correct Them" was cancelled today because it is "not in alignment with current NSF priorities" Shocking that understanding how people are misled by false information is now a forbidden topic. Our work will continue but at a smaller scale

Programming is essential for research in neuroscience and psychology. This Primer introduces ten principles guiding researchers toward writing clear, adaptable, and easily shareable code, supporting reproducible science. @martinhebart.bsky.social @tsawallis.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s44...

@uoelawschool.bsky.social is hiring a Teaching & Research Fellow in AI, Data & the Rule of Law. The post will include: ✨teaching responsibilities @edfuturesinstitute.bsky.social ↔️collaboration across @edinburgh-uni.bsky.social 🤝working closely with our CTMF team! Apply by 2 May ▶️ edin.ac/4ih5dP9

❗Now out in "AI and Ethics"❗ What are the consequences of AI that can reason counterfactually? Our new paper explores the ethical dimensions of AI-driven counterfactual world simulation. 🌎 🤖 With @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social, Rob MacCoun and Thomas Icard. Link: shorturl.at/bHYEO

“We argue that high-quality collective outcomes are endangered not only by self-interested individual defectors, but by ‘cartels’ of mutually satisfied mediocrities.” 👀 I’ve often referred to Gambetta’s book in the context of academic dysfunction. Very excited to discover more relevant work!

“Reasonableness” is widely seen as a very context-dependent term. A new study does reveal inter-country discrepancy about specifics, yet also finds it is well predicted by a blend of descriptive/prescriptive norms across contexts, languages and cultures: /1 buff.ly/meYMi7d

Just visited the National Museum of African American History and Culture last month, was absolutely amazed by its exhibition, and remember wondering how long it would be until it came under threat

Are our ordinary causal judgements biased?🔍And if so, is this really a problem?🧐Yes and yes✅, we (Markus Kneer and I) argue our newest paper! A short thread 🧵 /1 Open access: shorturl.at/FcWDF

I hadn't thought about this until I saw the story below. Genuinely now does feel up in the air. I've got family in the US, should I be worried about not being able to visit them too? The insecure authoritarian mindset wants to ban all criticism of dear leader! www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

1. New paper first-authored by @cjmott.bsky.social in press at JESP! Main result: punishments that fix harms, vs harm offenders, make offenders seem more redeemable. More in thread below, full text here: columbiasamclab.weebly.com/uploads/5/9/... 🧪 #PsychSciSky #SocialPsyc @socphilpsych.bsky.social

possibly the strangest time for a trip to DC, but still very much enjoyed my visit thanks to the excellent symposium on legal interpretation & data organized by @kevintobia.bsky.social & all its participants

The erosion of trust in science & scientists — sometimes due to complex social/historical factors but often deliberately perpetrated by charlatans — has tragic, deadly consequences, and, if unchecked, is an existential threat to society.

SO love this post from @paulbloomatyale.bsky.social! Real-world effects are awesome when you can get them, but psychologists run experiments in controlled environments "for the same reason that chemists keep their test tubes clean". YES!

Next week, Georgetown will host the Symposium on Legal Interpretation and Data ("SOLID"), with a possibility of zoom attendance. We'll have talks about data-informed legal interpretation from several fields: law, linguistics, computer science, and philosophy. solid-symposium.github.io/2025/

Americans express very different views in polling on tariffs depending on how the question is asked, a challenge for those trying to measure public support for a complex and poorly understood issue.