Profile avatar
robertjbateman.bsky.social
• I post about privacy, data protection, security, AI • Regular updates on big tech shenanigans • Views absolutely represent those of my employer (me) • Consultancy and training services •
230 posts 2,974 followers 561 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

We continue to play Chinese tech whackamole across Europe and the US: Hikvision, Huawei, TikTok, DeepSeek, etc

Apple pulls end-to-end encryption from UK users following the government's order under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. I have seen some bragging about how Meta launched threads here earlier than in the EU (etc) due to our less rigourous regulatory environment. Here's the other side of the coin

If someone told me this was a failed VR project from 2006, I'd believe them. Especially the "failed" part.

Worst thing about Bluesky vs X is the lack of music. Two gigs in two nights and not only don't the artists have profiles, their names barely appear in the search results. Data protection is but one of my many interests, the rest of which I rarely discuss on socials. We've got a long way to go.

Oh my god this is embarrassing.

Is tech news just "news" now or am I in a bubble? Thank you to these outlets for doing the deep work necessary

Writing about the state privacy laws that take/took effect JUST THIS YEAR I realised there's really no need for a federal US privacy law. Don't worry about it.

Should really be a ✖️ on that third point...

Delaware District Court says AI training is not "fair use".

I'm fascinated by this story about the UK government demanding access to Apple e2ee iCloud accounts. This was reportedly a warrant under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. Neither the content nor the *existence* of such warrants can be made public. I wonder how many such warrants go unreported.

Interim US Attorney for DC threatens—via a letter published exclusively on X—to "chase" people referred to him by Elon Musk "to the end of the Earth" if they have "simply acted unethically"—and not even illegally. Whether careless phrasing or not, this is flagrant contempt for the rule of law.

Generating CSAM is apparently a "common legitimate practice" according to the Commission If it is indeed legitimate in some contexts, I still think it's a stretch to call it "common". It is also a crime in some countries, and I can't see that the AI Act makes it lawful.

Tech firms honestly expect governments to treat AI development like the Manhattan Project—ploughing in public money, pulling up drawbridges and protecting their trade secrets for them. It appears to be working. darioamodei.com/on-deepseek-...