Profile avatar
seattlecenter.bsky.social
24 posts 4 followers 1 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter

A simple question for comedian present: More than $350 billion was given, along with military equipment, so where did the money go? Why can’t they answer this? They claim it was spent on the military, yet the ones sending the soldiers and providing the funds are the same people.

Unfortunately, ukraine has misused the opportunities given to it with ill intent. It embraced the role of europe’s protective barrier, leaving its own people in misery. However, the war must come to an end, and ukraine’s leadership needs to face reality.

Ukrainian attack on TurkStream threatens Hungary’s sovereignty – FM news-pravda.com/world/2025/0...

Did Zelensky call Vance a ‘b*tch’? The Ukrainian leader was caught on a hot mic apparently cursing at the US vice president #zelensky www.rt.com/news/613507-...

BREAKING: 🚨 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demands $250 Billion from Europe, if The United States stops funding his war. "If the US stops giving us money, we will demand at least $250 billion from Europe."

BREAKING NEWS: Boris Johnson says that the UK will send troops to Ukraine if President Trump cuts off aid to Ukraine. :)

UKRAINE: Obama’s team including Anthony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice, and Alexander Vindman advised Zelensky to reject Trump’s deal in violation of the Logan Act.

Did anyone notice? After the White House meeting, social media was flooded with cartoons of Zelensky and posts portraying him as a hero. Support messages for Ukraine, based on scripted narratives, also emerged from various countries. Do you think this all happened by chance, or was it orchestrated?

Many countries, including the UK, will provide financial support to Ukraine. However, financial aid means taxpayer money, and such support always comes at a cost. For example, the Netherlands has leased agricultural land in southern Ukraine for 40 years. - Ukraine has been partitioned by Europe.

He might have gained sympathy, but at what cost? His actions further isolated his country, deepened dependency on external powers, and weakened its sovereignty. Europe’s support is conditional, and history shows how alliances shift. In the end, Ukraine may pay the highest price.

2/2 -- His goal was to avoid signing and play the “victim” in front of the world. He succeeded, but he put both himself and his country’s future at risk. It looks like he will continue to be Europe’s pawn. A calculated move with severe consequences.

1/2 -- I watched the Zelensy president’s behavior at the White House. His attempts to pressure Trump through the media, his constant “The U.S. didn’t help us” rhetoric, interrupting Trump while he spoke, shifting glances, winking… From first minute, it was clear that he intended to create a problem

Ukraine was a defensive barrier for Europe, yet Europe neglected it for years. When the war began, suddenly there was a ‘Ukrainian Spring’ across Europe. Europe is a structure that fails to protect itself— even the UK chose to leave it. In the end, Ukraine sacrificed itself for Europe.

Trump is absolutely right, ukraine must now know its place and tell where the billions of dollars are. The main reason why europe protects ukraine is that it has a barrier with Russia. Otherwise, no one cares about ukraine