serow.bsky.social
439 posts
89 followers
198 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The view on my screen as I read this tweet.
comment in response to
post
Federal law prohibits you from transferring a handgun to anyone under 18 but there is no age limit for transferring a rifle. So you’d have to give the AR-15 to the kindergarteners and the Glock to the high schoolers.
comment in response to
post
Donni, I believe that with the proper training, you too could have the self confidence of a mediocre white man.
comment in response to
post
I apologize for him, on behalf of all Minnesotans.
comment in response to
post
The Trace’s own reporting found instances of licenses being revoked for first time paperwork errors.
www.thetrace.org/2024/10/atf-...
comment in response to
post
False
comment in response to
post
Hypocrite!
bsky.app/profile/aaro...
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Very enjoyable snoot
comment in response to
post
I always thought it was weird that they introduced a framing device in Crusader Kings 3 where you are an IT worker playing a grand strategy game after work because it is the only thing engaging enough to prevent you from doomscrolling for hours on end.
comment in response to
post
Wait, there is a framing narrative that you as the player are doing what you are actually doing?
comment in response to
post
No, we actually don’t want Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Pam Bondi to be in charge of what speech is allowed in our country. www.politico.com/news/magazin...
comment in response to
post
But at least they can start rescuing border collies now.
comment in response to
post
IMO it’s right to call it a hatchback with its proportions. There’s a weird unwritten rule in car taxonomy that seems to say that sedans can be big or small but hatchbacks are only small. Which is silly.
comment in response to
post
What makes what Van Dyke did experimental and not illustrative? It appears to consist of him taking apart a gun to illustrate which parts are accessories (and thus could be banned if a more dangerous version exists according to the decision) and which part consists of the "gun".
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
To protect themselves from the jackbooted thugs that are currently disappearing people who criticize the Trump regime.
comment in response to
post
Probably because he realized preventing people from building guns I’d more valuable than forcing them to engrave a serial number that will never be recorded anywhere.
comment in response to
post
Minnesota is playing this game right now. Our AG claimed to discover that under state law all guns must have a serial number. But he refuses to tell people the process to actually get their guns serialized.
comment in response to
post
It's amusing to me that Professor Franks is the academic going viral for criticizing the Trump administration's attacks on free speech given that the taglines of the two books she has written are "our deadly devotion to guns and free speech" and "breaking free from the first amendment".
comment in response to
post
AOC is just so much better on this issue. She's outstanding, and always has been. www.latinousa.org/2025/02/02/a...
comment in response to
post
Exactly. And it would be absurd to claim that an originalist understanding of the first amendment would mean that speech transmitted over a telegraph isn’t protected.
comment in response to
post
That is a few years before they passed the Federal Switchblade Act to restrict THE TOY THAT KILLS.
comment in response to
post
They interview a ballistics match expert from the case about his process and when they tell him it doesn’t sound very scientific he says “it’s more of an art than a science.” features.apmreports.org/in-the-dark/...
comment in response to
post
They interview a ballistics match expert from the case about his process and when they tell him it doesn’t sound very scientific he says “it’s more of an art than a science.” features.apmreports.org/in-the-dark/...
comment in response to
post