Profile avatar
sharonbrett.bsky.social
Associate Professor, University of Kansas Law School. Teaching civ pro/evidence/fed courts/social justice lawyering. Writing abt procedural and structural barriers to reform of govt institutions. Bio: https://law.ku.edu/people/sharon-brett
124 posts 740 followers 565 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

All these attacks on large law firms will have trickle down effects to smaller regional firms, too, and will absolutely devastate local non-profits' ability to litigate on behalf of the people they serve. Many states have little to no civil rights bar. Local orgs have 2, maybe 3 attnys at most. 🧵

The legal profession is actually chock full of public-interest-minded people who have made career choices that helped others but harmed their own career prospects. I hope lawyers weighing their own next steps will look around and see that.

I posted on this a few days ago, and maybe I will write this all up in a longer form essay/post/something soon -- but this ICE policy is remarkably similar to policies currently in effect in police departments across the US. See: www.aclukansas.org/en/cases/pro...

cc @yeargain.bsky.social

This is what a lack of due process does. It allows for assumptions to rule the day, without any opportunity for contestation.

I was a plaintiff-side litigator for a long time and whoooooo boy I would never even THINK of doing the thing the judge told me not to do in the time b/w the judge telling me not to do it and the formal order issuing. O/C would ask for harsh sanctions and the court would undoubtedly grant them.

Since it is in the news, a short 🧵on the use of tattoos to label people as "gang members." The tl/dr: state and local police forces do this routinely, and it results in people facing increased bail amounts (even for non-gang related crimes), more restrictive probation/parole conditions, and more.

Happy to say that this is now forthcoming in B.Y.U. Law Review. I'll be editing the last section in the next few months to account for . . . errr. . . changes at the federal level since I wrote this in fall. Feedback always welcome. Thanks to everyone who provided encouragement/feedback.

This sounds familiar . . . **Screams in KS SCR 1611**

Relevant to my recent paper, PD offices are now *backsliding* in what they report, from an already insufficient baseline. Awesome!

This is the central point of the seminar I teach - litigation is not and has never been a complete answer to repressive regimes. It’s a tool in the toolbox to be deployed strategically alongside other tactics.

A really interesting project that’s currently under submission, for the journal editors out there.