Profile avatar
skyseeker77.bsky.social
Just putting it out there and hoping it connects.
19 posts 9 followers 16 following
Regular Contributor
Posts 19 Comments 6

I can't think of anything more discrediting at this moment than NewsNation airing a photorealistic animations of UAP sightings and being less than clear about the nature of the video. An extremely curious choice.

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

Wait, the guy you said was Tony Stark was actually Lex Luthor?

submitted 10 days ago • 174 comments

That the House GOP lumping UAP/USO transparency in with 9/11 trutherism is all you need to know about their commitment to disclosure. If there's any action whatsoever, it'll be to steal tech and hand it off to the silconazis. Exactly. As. Expected.

submitted 12 days ago • 1 comment

This thread is worth paying attention to.

submitted 13 days ago • 0 comments

Curious that the sinkholes opening under Route 80 in New Jersey are happening right in the vicinity of the Picatinny Arsenal #NJdrones sightings. www.audacy.com/1010wins/new...

submitted 13 days ago • 0 comments

Peter Thiel? Just the guy who's been lurking around UFO World for the past few years, #ufosky. I really hate to say this, oh do I, but: Be _very_ skeptical of any UFO-related material that hypothetically comes out from Trump/Musk/Thiel actions, and even what's emerged recently. Be very discerning.

submitted 15 days ago • 5 comments

I see the kids are elbow deep in the candy jar. This would be interesting if it wasn't so incredibly terrifying.

submitted 17 days ago • 0 comments

This entire thread is spot on, but this post and the two after in particular hit the 🎯 for me.

submitted 17 days ago • 0 comments

You've got another thing coming if you believe that Luna's "big announcement" next week is some sort of truthful UAP disclosure in the public interest. Please stop trusting in the least trustworthy people in America.

submitted 18 days ago • 2 comments

They used to give the best evidence to supermarket tabloids and backwater UHF stations because they knew it would be self-discrediting. And for the most part, it worked. Keep that in mind the next time you find yourself wondering how Corbell seems to get some of the most compelling UAP evidence.

submitted 20 days ago • 2 comments

Exactly right.

submitted 25 days ago • 0 comments

Is UFOX still lapping up their bullshit or has the reality set in yet?

submitted 26 days ago • 17 comments

So, uh, if the #njdrones mostly had FAA clearance, why did the FAA shut down airports on an emergency basis and why were military facilities caught unaware? So much for Trump telling us the truth about the drones right when he came into office.

submitted 26 days ago • 0 comments

Of course Jeremy Cornell drives a Cybertruck with a UFO vanity license plate. Of course he does.

submitted 27 days ago • 0 comments

This is a great overview of what's been going on, from the players to their motives. The tech bros are clearly pulling the strings on "disclosure" to steal the technology and further their dominance of the global power structure. We are living in very interesting times.

submitted 28 days ago • 0 comments

George and Jeremy don't hold back much on here. I think Jeremy dropped 50 or so F bombs. I've been reserving judgement on this since the situation is confusing and Jeremy has gotten a lot of bad PR. After hearing his side, he got completely screwed. 1/5 #ufosky

submitted 28 days ago • 1 comment

I'd been looking forward to @pbs.org getting into the #uap doc game, but that new episode of Nova is embarrassing. Some of those debunkings made absolutely no sense. It felt almost... deliberately absurd.

submitted 31 days ago • 0 comments

The plan, as I understand it, is to seize the secret patents, auction them off to the highest US bidders (Musk, Bezos, Bigelow, etc) and then unmask the organization as the real Deep State. If we get disclosure along the way, that's when the 2027/2036 arrival is thrown out there. Sound about right?

submitted 33 days ago • 0 comments

Interesting to see the ufo / uap world succumb to the CSI problem, where the burden of proof is impossibly high. Skepticism is healthy, but only to a point.

submitted 35 days ago • 0 comments