Profile avatar
slderry.bsky.social
187 posts 6 followers 1 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
Posts 12 Comments 38

People should look up Process 2. Process 2 was the process used to mass produce Pfizer vaccine mRNA using e.coli. This process unfortunately creates a lot of junk DNA. There is a purification process, but guess what Pfizer cut corners on? Purification! So that's not good any way you cut it.

submitted 1 day ago • 0 comments

What's the plea? That I should wait for the slowest students in the room to catch up? I knew it was a lab leak by February 2020 because of the "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts..." paper. The next obvious question was why a once-in-a-lifetime lab leak occurred during Trump's election year.

submitted 1 day ago • 2 comments

Very qualified scientists said it was a lab leak and they said so early on. The reason, simplified, is that there are too many infectious elements on the spike protein to be present by natural evolution. Additionally even "undetectable" methods of genetic insertion can leave detectable traces.

submitted 1 day ago • 0 comments

This comes at nearly the same time as a Japanese study found Covid mRNA vaccinations are associated with lower survival of pancreatic cancer patients. The problem can only be hidden for so long.

submitted 2 days ago • 0 comments

Many people are not aware that the Pfizer Covid vaccine did not go through a proper Phase 3 clinical trial. FDA standards state that Phase 3 data should be collected for 1-4 years, the longer the better. Instead, Pfizer unblinded their Phase 3 placebo group after 6 mos. & they all got vaccinated.

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

The IgG4 issue has been discussed for years now. Short version: mRNA vaccination and boostering can result in a change in the type of antibodies you produce. These antibodies, IgG4: 1. Do not help kill Covid virus 2. Are linked to autoimmune disease 3. Suppress cancer vigilance

submitted 3 days ago • 1 comment

This is by far my favorite comment on the thread where I try to get a science expert to simply admit that Covid vaccine mRNA is modified with pseudouridine. Maybe not safe, I asked? Here, Evelyn explains it's safe because...well, because...methylating...there's a biological process that...hmmm.

submitted 5 days ago • 1 comment

I love to cite proof. "Researchers found that a subset of PVS participants had detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in their bloodstream, with...cases showing antigen persistence up to 709 days... prolonged spike protein exposure has been linked to chronic immune activation." Yale, Listen study

submitted 5 days ago • 2 comments

Oh, Scarlett. Two people REALLY did win the 2023 Nobel prize for creating synthetic vaccine mRNA using pseudouridine. If this is not true, then what is the correct information?

submitted 5 days ago • 3 comments

No, Chris. That's not what I think. I think that when scientists create a novel drug, it requires long-term testing. There are good reasons that the human body should not produce the same antigen for months on end because of hyper-durable synthetic mRNA. www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...

submitted 5 days ago • 2 comments

Amber calls me "dumb" for pointing out that vaccine mRNA is synthetically modified using pseudouridine. News flash: Scientists modified mRNA because it is fragile. The vaccine mRNA can last for months in your body, making your cells spew antigen. Did they tell you the vaccines worked that way?

submitted 5 days ago • 2 comments

No, Amber, I don't think that something synthetic is necessarily more dangerous. I think that modified mRNA that takes weeks or months to break down in the body and induces cells to churn out massive amounts of antigen COULD be dangerous. Can you think of some reasons why?

submitted 5 days ago • 0 comments