someotherbri.bsky.social
Something deep and mind-provoking, you say?
182 posts
35 followers
32 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Easier than it looks considering 2^20 times 10^20....
comment in response to
post
I've been known to load the Halen in the back of the van.
comment in response to
post
I think it has to do with equations of heat transfer, when the degrees are Kelvin the formulas "work" linearly. (Been a while)
comment in response to
post
Because I'm a lobster looking to get cooked? 😜
(seriously though, using temperature linearly really requires Kelvin, no?)
comment in response to
post
He was great as the host of Lost in the 2000s, too! Nobody remembers it...
comment in response to
post
100 miles per hour apart from each other, we need 40% of an hour.
comment in response to
post
I can quickly chime in that the order won't matter, since on/off is a binary state so X flips provide for any switch's polarity the same result
comment in response to
post
It's like when Eric Montross said he hoped to have half the career Robert Parish had.
comment in response to
post
Flip switch 2 again, that gives you XXOO
Then flip switch 1 to get you OOOO
comment in response to
post
I thought it was going to be a "guided experience" where a Scott Hanson type leads the bouncing about from match to match.
comment in response to
post
or as it's also pronounced, F Elon.
comment in response to
post
dang that Syracuse sports journalism school keeps poppin' 'em out
comment in response to
post
Rodgers must admit his only SB title came because the Jets knocked out Brady/Pats for him that year.
comment in response to
post
I'm getting 2/20 that it's inside, 6/20 outside, and 12/20 on the edge.
The inside represent the 2 big equilateral skip-every-other vertex. The outside represent the 30-30-120 triangles at each of the 6 vertices.
comment in response to
post
Unlike the beatles, pink floyd actually sucks! Except when they don't. That's the thing. Even *my* band has a decent song or two, I just have to force you to believe it enough!
comment in response to
post
Harder to write that in as today's date, though! cheers.
comment in response to
post
Are we also accepting -7/2 ± (√151)i/2 ?
comment in response to
post
nice, figuring spots for the 11 and 7 (or their negatives) was step 1.
comment in response to
post
Only two odd factors to use, so they gotta go in opposite corners to make the sums work.
Then a little trial and error on the choices for 17.
comment in response to
post
and they'll still get their ass kicked by the team from Connecticut.
comment in response to
post
How did e day come about? Did it just derive from itself naturally? :)
comment in response to
post
kinda fun....bottom right was obviously where I started.
comment in response to
post
Buck realizes where in the joke he fits now, and it's probably helped his reputation.
comment in response to
post
I order them uncut and make segments.
comment in response to
post
unless, dumbass, you actually select a different screen.
comment in response to
post
Brady wishes he'd had Pete back in 2000, was too late to join forces in NE apparently.
comment in response to
post
No. The linear coefficient is (b+d) which is never an integer if b is and d isn't or vice versa.
comment in response to
post
So what's the Chemical X in this concoction? :)
comment in response to
post
it's almost like exponential functions are their own derivative or something....
comment in response to
post
2 - √3 = .268, 2 + √3 = 3.732
(x + .268)(x + 3.732) =
x^2 + 4x + 1
comment in response to
post
first glance that's a harmonica, bass drum, and guitar. So, not a band of musicians there?
comment in response to
post
(6x + 1.5)(2x + .66667) =
12x^2 + 7x + 1
comment in response to
post
The more advanced your society, the fewer gods. Cavemen worshipped everything, the Greeks got it down to a core dozen or so, the Hebrews got it down to 1, the Christians split it kinda a third - a third - a third....
lim as t->infinity =
comment in response to
post
oh right, the coefficients aren't integers. Yeah, I can use (.75x + .75) times (1.33x + 1.33) and factor out the 3/4 and 4/3.
comment in response to
post
isn't multiplication closed under Big Z? I suspect the bd term to be an integer.