He didn't. He couldn't even produce unedited audio from their couple's therapy—his lawyer "leaked" edited clips to grifters.
She was disallowed key evidence bc the judge had never overseen a DV case before + had no idea what she was doing (+ a history of siding w/abusive men in custody hearings)
I care about the facts as I know them. If the court had sufficient evidence to prove his innocence then that’s all she wrote. She could have appealed. She didn’t.
I don’t think that the P reference highlights the misogyny. It just underlines the fact that said lawyer would do business with the worst of the worst. That kind of thing.
Great article and yeah, this part.......just wow. As a victim of DARVO inflicted on me privately, I cannot even imagine being Heard and going thru all that in public.
Comments
She was disallowed key evidence bc the judge had never overseen a DV case before + had no idea what she was doing (+ a history of siding w/abusive men in custody hearings)