ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
bnewbold.net
•
54 days ago
add private data to atproto?
or add atproto to private data?
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
deck.blue
•
54 days ago
4
reply
[–]
retr0.id
•
54 days ago
like, a full atproto stack running in a private (wireguard?) intranet?
14
1
reply
[–]
evbogue.com
•
54 days ago
Bluesky over Yggdrasil please
5
reply
[–]
samantha.wiki
•
54 days ago
Both pls
0
reply
[–]
jeffg.ca
•
53 days ago
Dumb test: slap atproto oauth in front of something like the Firefox sync service, which is encrypted at rest. Biggest UX headache is recovery.
0
1
reply
[–]
jeffg.ca
•
53 days ago
This is atproto to private data. The first doesn’t make sense to me
0
reply
[–]
alexjs.dev
•
54 days ago
Whatever can be standardized and widely adopted.
What could make reddit want to support atproto? Are there good reasons for them to forfeit some data ownership to their users? I'm skeptical.
0
reply
[–]
ngerakines.me
•
54 days ago
Add atproto to private data -- This has so much potential
18
1
reply
[–]
bmann.ca
•
54 days ago
And likely the case for e2ee with a chat lexicon? cc @boscolo.co
6
reply
[–]
wills.co.tt
•
54 days ago
What if there was a secret third thing?
7
reply
[–]
mikestaub.social
•
53 days ago
ATproto inside private data is far safer and more flexible. We can technically already do the former with meta protocols like
https://mask.io
0
reply
[–]
rog.bsky.social
•
54 days ago
um, both?
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
What could make reddit want to support atproto? Are there good reasons for them to forfeit some data ownership to their users? I'm skeptical.