To be categoric - I always meet any individual or group of constituents, including those who have wanted to discuss disability benefits. And it’s disgraceful to entirely falsely attribute language to me (as that article does)
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
To be equally categoric, you have "politely declined" to meet us for a public debate, which is what we asked, and you have indeed used that language, and avoided every opportunity to correct it. Instead of an ugly argument over the internet, we repeat our call for a fair and respectful public debate
Hmm. Who to believe? A politician who will say anything that makes him look good or a group of disability activists wanting to put him straight of some of the abhorrent policies he supports...
Comments
Because the consultation process is seriously flawed
Because 250 people and organisations, including a national Labour-affiliated trade union, have called for one.
Now you’re accusing him of “refusing to have a public debate”
Do you not understand they are completely different things?
https://swanseabaynews.com/2025/04/25/swansea-mp-politely-declines-disability-group-public-meeting-call/