A great thread that may help explain why the three liberals didn't join with Gorsuch and Thomas.
This case was NOT litigated by the tribe itself, but by the Becket Fund—a conservative group that regularly argues for Christian supremacy and clearly saw this dispute as a vehicle for its broader aims.
This case was NOT litigated by the tribe itself, but by the Becket Fund—a conservative group that regularly argues for Christian supremacy and clearly saw this dispute as a vehicle for its broader aims.
Reposted from
Maggie Blackhawk
The Supreme Court denied cert today in a complicated and controversial case involving federal Indian law, Apache Stronghold. This case, brought by a nonprofit and not a Native nation, focused closely on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (rights) over the treaty violations (power).
Comments
It’s an incestuous cesspool of right wing lawyers, groups, and dark money groups. Leonard Leo received their highest honor. Roger and Carrie Severino. Bill Barr.
A real rogues gallery.
Apache Stronghold was founded by a San Carlos tribal elder/former chair and the tribe and other tribes are at the center of the coalition.
Get your basic facts straight, you work for a name-brand outlet.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/04/supreme-court-preview-alito-thomas-lgbtq-censorship.html
Uh yeah, the Court's precedents on the 10 commandments and on school prayer haven't gone anywhere.
>Discussion of a case involving native Indian religious practices
>Oh but they're bringing this other case
>Lead plaintiff is called Mahmoud.
Yeah if you cannot discern the irony here and the utter nonsense I cannot help you. Pathetic stuff even for you today.
You're really off target on this line of things over the Apache Stronghold's petition denial & what's really going on in the Mahmoud case.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/us-supreme-court-spurns-native-american-challenge-rio-tintos-arizona-copper-2025-05-27/