I think a lot of the conflict driven nature of conversations here could be addressed by just hiding replies after one or two generations of children. right now You have to watch people duke it out in endlessly narrow rivers of bullshit with no way to them fold or hide them - ThreadSky

deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com • 1 day ago

I think a lot of the conflict driven nature of conversations here could be addressed by just hiding replies after one or two generations of children. right now You have to watch people duke it out in endlessly narrow rivers of bullshit with no way to them fold or hide them

Comments

gracekind.net•1 day ago

Hey, those are loadbearing rivers of bullshit

valhallaresearch.net•1 day ago

this should be configurable in the front end imho. might dig into the code later to see if it fits anywhere

deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com•1 day ago

I didn't think the front end was open?

valhallaresearch.net•1 day ago

am I tripping trying to read a readme at the gym or is this it

https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app

deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com•1 day ago

Oh maybe i am regarded

valhallaresearch.net•1 day ago

we would be on equal footing then

burnham.bsky.social•1 day ago

It's already happens to some degree, for hiding middle children in a long hierarchical exchange. The challenge probably won't be in the actual implementation, but a ux that fits well within the existing paradigms