NYTimes again scraping the bottom of the barrel to publish someone, anyone, with a pro-Trump argument, no matter how absurd the argument is, no matter how little credibility the author has, or whether the author already has their own billionaire-subsidized platform.
Comments
I am sure I am not 1st one to say this, but NYT should register as a utility if it is going to gaslight us this much.
Archive link as well: https://archive.ph/Ym0lO
"Propaganda on demand? I can Douthat"
Repeat after me: "The New York Times is, and always has been, absolute shit"
I want people to talk about the NYT, but as a cautionary tale.
"Wow, we better be careful how we report on this issue, don't want to end up like the people who used to own the New York Times"
"Let's not repeat the same mistakes as those dumbasses at the New York Times"
Etc.
They have one interest: selling as many advertising slots to as many advertisers as possible, as expensively as possible. This is why the pathology of “balance” has become a thing.
Ivana stated publicly, that trump had Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ on his bedside table, but sure, he never heard about Hitler! 🙄😖
The newspaper of the wealthy white person whose life will not be significantly impacted now matter who wins the election.
It’s unconscionable, that they are promoting Project 2025 along with him, that will kill the social safety net & democracy!
VOTE BLUE ALL DOWN BALLOT! 🔥
FOH Nee York Times.
Everyone involved in witting & publishing that article needs to immediately to quit journalism & on national apology tour.
https://bsky.app/profile/sea-level.bsky.social/post/3l2lu7pvw6w22
The whole “Mussolini drained the swamp” thing was nothing but an ecological atrocity. And a weak metaphor as such.
I WILL NEVER PAY FOR THE NYT.
I like her odds here. Rich’s counter examples are a string of racist and misogynistic tropes. Weirdo.
I was right.