As long as the code isn't wound back to remove any existing support, they should be okay.
From Sciex's point of view, I can see the challenge in justifying funding software whose Project Leader is a Thermo consultant.
Hopefully both parties can find a middle-ground and resolve this ASAP.
I am indeed assuming that Sciex are being reasonable.
There is the alternative that they’re building a walled, closed-source software ecosystem that is designed to extract as much money from their customers as possible, and Skyline is a roadblock for that plan.
No idea. The Skyline team are being transparent about this, so hopefully Sciex follows suit and explains their perspective soon.
Otherwise it reflects poorly on Sciex.
Comments
From Sciex's point of view, I can see the challenge in justifying funding software whose Project Leader is a Thermo consultant.
Hopefully both parties can find a middle-ground and resolve this ASAP.
There is the alternative that they’re building a walled, closed-source software ecosystem that is designed to extract as much money from their customers as possible, and Skyline is a roadblock for that plan.
Otherwise it reflects poorly on Sciex.