Layers of information in an archival document:
- What is said
- What is not said
- What is alluded to
- What is omitted intentionally
(and unintentionally)
- What is misleading
- What is ambiguous
- What is highlighted
- What is downplayed
- What is weaponized
- What is unintelligible today
...
- What is said
- What is not said
- What is alluded to
- What is omitted intentionally
(and unintentionally)
- What is misleading
- What is ambiguous
- What is highlighted
- What is downplayed
- What is weaponized
- What is unintelligible today
...
Comments
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111187846-010/html
There's so much more to say that don't fit in a post :)
See also here an older relevant post:
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:kzl46e5e7pjfynhkko2g236z/post/3ld5agbxkec2w
Also, here is a recent piece I've written that might have something of use to you: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111187846-010/html
If only people would apply this more broadly. Alas.