Of course the danger is that we turn away from this *extremely successful* policy in a fit of xenophobia and isolationism, leading to an unnecessary deterioration in the free world's actually quite strong strategic position.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
never going to get over these idiots looking at a world the US successfully built for its own benefit and tearing it up because they are so stupid they think if anyone else also benefits then it's not actually pro-US
no one would've gotten on board if it didn't benefit them too!
At what point does "we turn away" become "we turned away" if threatening to invade Canada, Greenland and Panama, plus publicly musing about not supporting Taiwan should the PRC invade hasn't already done so?
Just a quick reminder that the "extremely successful policy" you're talking about is slaughtering civilians until the victims will acquiesce to your terrorism.
The only threat is you Nazi psychos murdering innocents.
Ur "friends" were bombed into surrendering to a Nazi terrorism protection racket
“Why didn’t Iran pick better friends” like as if when conflict breaks out the countries line up and just pick a side rather than decades of historical geopolitical interests playing a formative role in whom nations ally with
But he’s suggesting these are “friends” instead of eopolitical allies with shared interests who’s interests are diametrically opposed to other geopolitical blocs as if all it would take is for them to come to a compromise when they want the complete destruction of the other side
If there is one thing Trump seems to be good at it’s fucking up a winning hand. He always manages to come out clean on the other side but everybody else in the pot gets fucked. Really glad we elected him again.
Our track record in supporting the 'free' world has been kinda shit. Most of our backing goes to authoritarians or genociders. Ukraine is like... one of the few bright spots of US military assistance since ww2
It didn't start in 1943; that was just the most recent big one. Britain killed 30 million people in Bengal alone during its rule due to artificially engineered famines.
yeah I think those "rumors" are pretty well confirmed. When Pinochet needed to hide out from Baltazar Garzon he went to the UK and that was not a location he picked out of a hat.
tho the US mightily screwed over ukraine too once trump got into power
and even before that, biden was much more constrained than i expected him to be, and had only allowed the use of long-range US munitions into russian territory after the election
fwiw every single thing trump has done makes total rational sense from the perspective of someone deliberately trying to undo exactly the positive dynamic bret is describing about america here
in particular making america itself one of the beleaguered miserable "friends of russia"
We support democracy for white people, sure. Mostly. Like there was never a possibility to put authoritarian regimes into western europe. I guess we're lucky we didn't try and set up a dictatorship in Japan immediately post ww2.
Comments
no one would've gotten on board if it didn't benefit them too!
The only threat is you Nazi psychos murdering innocents.
Ur "friends" were bombed into surrendering to a Nazi terrorism protection racket
In a box
In a box
Lizzy’s in a box
In a box
In a box
https://www.keymilitary.com/article/give-maggie-everything-she-needs
your very direct question has now been answered
and even before that, biden was much more constrained than i expected him to be, and had only allowed the use of long-range US munitions into russian territory after the election
in particular making america itself one of the beleaguered miserable "friends of russia"
I peg your pardon?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War