He's obviously running for President but it's still a good move and also, notably, just light years better than alternative tactics like, just spitballing here, "repeatedly invite fascists on a podcast to help you embrace transphobia"
Reposted from
Isaac Dovere
NEW from me -
Tim Walz is headed back out on the road – this time, for a tour of House districts represented by Republicans who have stopped holding in-person town halls amid the raucous receptions some of their colleagues have gotten across the country. www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/p...
Tim Walz is headed back out on the road – this time, for a tour of House districts represented by Republicans who have stopped holding in-person town halls amid the raucous receptions some of their colleagues have gotten across the country. www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/p...
Comments
TBH, I'd consider him one of the frontrunners for 2028 if he wanted it, and for good reason.
*eyes Newsom and Shapiro*
And challenging Republicans does not mean hosting them on your podcast and agreeing with them that trans people are icky.
https://www.kcra.com/article/california-fast-food-law-panera-gov-gavin-newsom-controversy-explained/60115774
I'd have figured having someone decent, competent, and committed to the rule of law would be good, but I guess not.
“An obituary.”
“Those are on page 16.”
“Not the one I want to see.”
And it won’t be @amyklobuchar.com
Explain how we want to get rid of actual waste and fraud!
That said, I think it's optimistic to think there will be free and fair elections in the US in four years
I don't even think this last one was a free and fair election...
Greasy Gav is like...I can't say I'm disappointed in him bc most of what I see is "He's shifty" at best and "He fucking sucks" at worst, but I thought'd he'd at least be smarter than this podcast BS
People like Tulsi can pull off the party swap but not Greasy Gav
And. *And* it’s ALL a good move! Running, getting into “their” space, all good.
“Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”