I knew it was going to be bad, but it was worse.
Honestly, the most shocking thing is how shitty the originalist “argument” was that the judge decided to award. Originalism is always pretty stupid and usually involves some lazy history, but this just takes the cake for stupid.
Honestly, the most shocking thing is how shitty the originalist “argument” was that the judge decided to award. Originalism is always pretty stupid and usually involves some lazy history, but this just takes the cake for stupid.
Words fail me.
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/21/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/21/u...
Comments
He’s just wrong all around. But that’s pretty standard for originalism. You have to be susceptible to misreading history and bad logic.