ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
qexat.com
•
8 days ago
in my experience they absolutely do not fix any of these issues
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
texoport.in
•
8 days ago
you could totally make them work without undecipherable nomenclature!
5
3
reply
[–]
qexat.com
•
8 days ago
I don't like this 😭
5
reply
[–]
texoport.in
•
8 days ago
the applicative notation in haskell used with parser combinators really fucks with my head though i've recently reluctantly started using them more
3
reply
[–]
bisimulation.bsky.social
•
8 days ago
Look what they need to do to mimick just a fraction of the power of do notation
4
1
reply
[–]
texoport.in
•
8 days ago
ya, i wish we had a nicer syntax for it but it was surprisingly easy to get it working!
https://github.com/saiashirwad/parserator/blob/bd453cf55b3fe24d91fb54bf0fa67a0b39003733/src/parser.ts#L310
3
reply
[–]
bisimulation.bsky.social
•
8 days ago
Why? The only thing I don't like is that they are stupidly slow
2
1
reply
[–]
welltypedwit.ch
•
8 days ago
have you seen the staged selective parser combinators paper?
3
1
reply
[–]
bisimulation.bsky.social
•
8 days ago
No but I guess now I have to, thanks
3
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments