ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
richburroughs.dev
•
43 days ago
What if we took this very important process and made it depends on a computer program that occasionally spits out bullshit?
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
angus-chassis.bsky.social
•
43 days ago
Just go ahead and plug that output directly into a database we treat downstream as deterministic. It'll be fine.
1
reply
[–]
praisethe-sun.bsky.social
•
43 days ago
occasionally? It spits out bullshit far more reliably than it spits out anything useful
1
reply
[–]
leosstankytaint.bsky.social
•
43 days ago
They are adult Huggies, not Depends.
0
reply
[–]
codybunch.com
•
43 days ago
Best case? Probably nothing more than the humans in the loop whom occasionally do the same. But… that is best case. Reality will be another story.
1
1
reply
[–]
kathleencarson.bsky.social
•
43 days ago
Yeah, but that bullshit is human speed and human volume. The new and improved version is supercomputer speed and volume bullshit!
3
reply
[–]
swestwood.net
•
43 days ago
Occasionally?
1
reply
[–]
volkan.io
•
43 days ago
It is everywhere!
Some say “it’s okay if there is a human actor as a stopgap”.
But in real life it will be like this:
Bot: » Hey, I am AI-RAN LLM* here are 1347 changes in your radio access network that are biz-critical.
Operator: « Yeah, whatevs.
—
* there already is an O-RAN standard for it.
1
1
reply
[–]
richburroughs.dev
•
43 days ago
Yeah anyone who’s had alert fatigue can see that coming. It will be even worse if the operator doesn’t trust the AI.
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
Some say “it’s okay if there is a human actor as a stopgap”.
But in real life it will be like this:
Bot: » Hey, I am AI-RAN LLM* here are 1347 changes in your radio access network that are biz-critical.
Operator: « Yeah, whatevs.
—
* there already is an O-RAN standard for it.