afishstick.bsky.social
46 posts
43 followers
309 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Yeah, that's a block to you "ICE must be destroyed." You're ripping apart necessary context to kill something you clearly hate.
Which is 100%...stupid. Goodbye, troll. I hope others can think. And so much of this social media trash is that you get traction. S T O P.
comment in response to
post
Tren de Aragua... [M]etro de [A]ra[G]u[A]... MAGA. Make it happen.
comment in response to
post
Someone really needs to come up with some kind of MS-13, Tren de Aragua "tattoo" that is actually "MAGA"
Aragua is SOOOOO close. "Metro de AraGuA?"
comment in response to
post
My guy, you persist in the world of the ALL OR NOTHING. :(
Look at how you argue this...
"_most_ powerful man"
"to do _anything_"
"_full_ immunity"
"_NOTHING_"
Again, block me, but... Moderate that THIS or THAT.
comment in response to
post
And I say this despite liking your profile data. Slava Ukraini 100%. I guess I can be black and white on that one. ...Just like the USA used to be in defending "freedom" and "democracy" pre-Trump.
comment in response to
post
You live in the weird "black and white" world where there is ALL or NOTHING, just like Rob.
"FULL agreement"
"ALL the other"
"100% complicit"
"did nothing."
"NOTHING"
Quality response, amigo. Block me if you want, but... you obviously can't see beyond the black of white photos/content of Rob.
comment in response to
post
Your response remains in "black and white" territory. ~~"Anything???"~~ They attempted SOMETHING. Now, was it effective? No, it ultimately wasn't, through Republican and judicial (district ct./SCOTUS) gamesmanship.
Regardless, you persist in this overly simplistic view of things. That's on YOU.
comment in response to
post
What would you have them do? Take black and white photos? For black and white opinions and takes? Simplistic worldview when they can literally do *nothing*, I guess, is appropriate.
comment in response to
post
Whatabout... Whatabout... Whatabout...
Whatabout...not comparing apples and ORANGES?
comment in response to
post
Just wait until he signs another one calling it "American."
comment in response to
post
Why not just spam lists of "five things" to any publicly available number (through Google) of all those associated with DOGE? Or their LinkedIn profiles? Or their FB accounts? Twitter accounts? Whatever else? Blow it ALLLLLL up.
(including their alts--and Elon's...which he probably still uses.)
comment in response to
post
Reps should have to hold their "rallies" like this as supporters' venues rather than schools/public institutions. Maybe "eggs" thrown will actually be a consequence when viewed in light of a "Dodge" or "Nissan" sign in the background.
comment in response to
post
'Bout time for those "never Threads/Blueskyers" to leave the hellhole? It's not the "public square" anymore. Never was... Had it been, it would've been pretty well regulated, right? And now it's just "right"...i.e. Nazi.
comment in response to
post
"Doggie" will suddenly fire all staff working on that, doncha know.
comment in response to
post
Ignore it? ...As I recall, but it's been a while, they ...CAN'T. They're "public records" and searchable. There's an element of "You made a decision not in support of comments received" and "WHY?" that gets asked by courts. Courts seem to be the only ones holding up anything so...give them tools?
comment in response to
post
Curious...can anyone open a case against any media member? Why not brigade misc. cases against conservative media? And then through humanistic social media (here?) make complaints rise to the "top"?
comment in response to
post
This is 100% what everyone should do. It's all doom and gloom. Just tell them it's KOSHER and GREAT. Comments are...comments. This isn't tyranny. COMMENT! DO GOOD!
comment in response to
post
Seriously, just submit...and do the reverse of what they want?
comment in response to
post
So...weaponize it in the alternate direction and make some random functionary say 70% say it's FINE and 30% say DESTROY DEMS. At least that becomes part of the record? 70-30 pro-democracy?
comment in response to
post
Friends, how about...filing a -supportive- comment? Let's let them grapple with comments that -run contrary- to the demand? Or maybe...filing an -ambivalent- comment to negate insanity that (R)s likely won't file anyway, unless prompted by their church/Twitter(aka WH press feed)?
comment in response to
post
Mine is "poignant" - almost 100% AI.
comment in response to
post
Kid's life isn't really being ruined if he has literally some of the most powerful people in the world supporting him.
But, hey, I guess being accountable sucks, right?
SO GLAD THIS ISN'T TWITTER.
comment in response to
post
Stupid kid doing shit. COOL!
Professional reporting - doing their actual professional job - CRAP!
So...kill the professional and not the punk?
So I say... Side with stupid... over intelligent? Thanks, Trump/Vance.
comment in response to
post
And "apps" are just crappy "programs" that could do more and didn't need a silly new name.
I can't stand lesser versions of computers. Like...why?
comment in response to
post
L33T young minds.
comment in response to
post
Because...modern life isn't ROBLOX?! LOL.
comment in response to
post
We hope.
comment in response to
post
Hahahhaahahahhahahaa.
comment in response to
post
In-fucking-deed. FAFO.
comment in response to
post
Uh, the too obvious... "Right Here, Right Now"?
comment in response to
post
I think he left out the part where the government allowed it and accelerated it.
Perhaps all those copyright/etc. protections should've been ignored. Like current laws/regulations.
Deepwhatever did it with OpenAI's ChatGPT, right? Let's let it alllll loose because no governmental regs matter.
comment in response to
post
someBODY - damn my memory!
comment in response to
post
This would actually be tremendously hilarious as a cover.
eve6 should attempt it!!
And any other of odd-as-hell mashups from the late 90s/early 2000s.
Someone once told me the World I Know
By eve6
comment in response to
post
Eventually, she will be...and she'll be muted/blocked by such a large spectrum her voice will be destroyed.
And we'll all rejoice.
comment in response to
post
Didn't realize you had made it to the BLUE. Welcome! :D
comment in response to
post
And...two years from now...seize his assets.
comment in response to
post
I did this on account of what you said. But why mute instead of block? For the others who might do the same!
comment in response to
post
Hi Tommy, yeah, you get a block. A bit too much for me. Enjoy! I hope you can tone it down for others. :D
Welcome to the world of your viewpoint matters little.
comment in response to
post
Maybe if many sane folks pay for Bluesky, it'll save it from advertising-limited death. And then it can actually keep alive all the dying old media platforms that many of us rely on. Pay for Bluesky, the distributor, and be subject to ads on the links at websites. Symbiosis. This is the way.
comment in response to
post
I followed him before; I've blocked him now. Less poison is the world is always good. Let's hope to allow more blocks.
comment in response to
post
Because blocking can happen here, you absolute twat. Back to the your XXX world.
comment in response to
post
It is FANTASTIC that you went through with asking. If there's some lying on her part...it at least has sent a message and creates some dissonance.
comment in response to
post
I've read your stuff since 2004ish. I'm a lurker. And a lot has changed since then. I appreciate evolution.
comment in response to
post
Or... Watch for massive overreach and then...Supreme Court reform? If Democracy withstands Trump, why not change things post-Trump? Especially if (R)s nuke the filibuster. Ebb and flow.